Acer Liquid Z200 vs Nokia Lumia 530: Comparison

Comparison of features, performance, design, battery, camera and connectivity between the following smartphones: Acer Liquid Z200 vs Nokia Lumia 530. The complete information of specifications to decide which to buy.

Devices

Ki Note

Ki Cost-effectiveness
No price,
no Ki
6.3
Cost-effectiveness
Design & Materials
1.9
2
Performance & Hardware
1.8
1.9
Camera
1.7
2.8
Connectivity
1.7
2.7
Battery
1.8
1.7

Basics

Brand

Brand
Aliases
--
RM-1017, RM-1019 Dual

Release Date

Release date
September 2014, 5 years ago
July 2014, 5 years ago
State
Not available
On Sale

Design & Materials

Structure

Size
65.0 mm
126.5 mm
10.0 mm
62.3 mm
119.7 mm
11.7 mm
Weight
130 g
129 g
Usable surface
55 %
59 %
Materials
-
Plastic
Resistance
-
-
Colors
Black

Blue

Pink

White

Yellow
Gray

Green

Orange

White

Screen

Diagonal
4"
4"
Type
LCD IPS
LCD IPS
Aspect Ratio
5:3
16:9
Resolution
480 x 800 px
480 x 854 px
Density
233 Pixels per inch
245 Pixels per inch
Others
  • Capacitive
  • Multi-touch
  • Without Notch
  • Capacitive
  • Multi-touch
  • Without Notch

Prototypes





Prototypes
Acer Liquid Z200
Print 3D Model
Nokia Lumia 530
Print 3D Model

Photos

Photos

Performance & Hardware

Processor

Model
MediaTek MT6572M
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
CPU
ARM Cortex-A7
ARM Cortex-A7
Type
Dual-Core
Quad-Core
Frequency
1 GHz
1.2 GHz
64 Bits
No
No

Graphics

GPU
ARM Mali-400 MP
Qualcomm Adreno 302

RAM

RAM
512 MB
512 MB
Type
--
--

Antutu

Score
9.891
Overall performance better than 1% of devices
11.447
Overall performance better than 2% of devices

Storage

Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Type
--
--
SD Slot
Yes
Independent SD slot
Yes
Independent SD slot

Security

Fingerprint
No
No

Sensors

Sensors
  • Accelerometer
  • Light sensor
  • Proximity
  • Accelerometer

Others

Notifications LED
--
--
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No

Camera

Rear camera

Standard
1
Resolution
2 Mpx
Sensor
Unknown
Type
Unknown
Aperture
Unknow
ISO
--
Pixel size
--

Rear camera

Standard
1
Resolution
5 Mpx
Sensor
Unknown
Type
Unknown
Aperture
ƒ/ 2.4
ISO
100 - 800
Pixel size
--
Flash
No
LED
Features
  • Continuous shooting
  • Digital zoom
  • Face detection
  • Panorama
  • Face detection
  • Geotagging
  • ISO settings
  • Panorama
  • Scene mode
  • White balance settings
Slow Motion Video
No
30 fps
No
30 fps
Optical Stabilisation
No
No

Selfie

Features
-
-

Connectivity

Networks

5G
-
-
4G LTE
-
-
3G
  • B1 (2100)
  • B8 (900)
  • B1 (2100)
  • B2 (1900)
  • B5 (850)
  • B8 (900)
2G
  • B2 (1900)
  • B3 (1800)
  • B5 (850)
  • B8 (900)
  • B2 (1900)
  • B3 (1800)
  • B5 (850)
  • B8 (900)

SIM card

Dual SIM
Dual Sim Dual Standby
Single Sim
Type
Micro SIM
Micro SIM
Micro SIM

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi
  • 802.11b
  • 802.11g
  • 802.11n
  • 802.11b
  • 802.11g
  • 802.11n
Others
  • Wi-Fi Hotspot

Bluetooth

Version
Bluetooth 4.0
Bluetooth 4.0
Others
  • A2DP (Advanced Audio Distribution Profile)
  • EDR (Enhanced Data Rate)
  • A2DP (Advanced Audio Distribution Profile)
  • AVRCP (Audio/Visual Remote Control Profile)
  • GATT (Generic Attribute Profile)
  • HFP (Hands-Free Profile)
  • OPP (Object Push Profile)
  • PBAP/PAB (Phone Book Access Profile)

Navigation

Navigation
  • A-GPS
  • GPS
  • A-GPS
  • GLONASS
  • GPS

USB

USB
  • Charging
  • Mass Storage
  • Charging
  • Mass Storage

SAR

European measurement

The European Union sets a limit of 2 W/kg averaged over 10 grams of tissue.

--
--
American measurement

The FCC limit is 1.6 W/kg measured in a volume of 1 gram of tissue

0.750 W/Kg on head
1.400 W/Kg on body
--

Others

Others
  • Audio Jack
  • Computer sync
  • OTA sync
  • Audio Jack
  • Radio FM
  • Computer sync
  • OTA sync
  • Tethering.

Battery

Battery
Capacity
1300 mAh
1430 mAh
Type
Li-Ion
Li-Ion
Fast charge
No
No
Others
  • Non-removable
  • Removable

Software

Software
Operating System
Android 4.4.2 KitKat
Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1

Prices

Prices unavailable

Prices