you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra reviews by real users Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra
- 6.8"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 233 g93.9 mm186.4 mm6.8 mm
- SnapD. 652 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 73.500
- 4600 mAh
- 1 22.5 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX318 Exmor RS SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.0 Nougat
User score
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery9.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Performance & Hardware
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Camera
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Connectivity
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 0%One day
- 100%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
2 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
2 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 50%Every two months or less
2 reviews
User reviews
- AutoGiant
It is a phablet with atypical dimensions (6.8 ") and it takes the hands that go with it to hold it.Once we adopted the size, it is a smartphone very pleasant to use, its screen is bright, the multimedia performance at the appointment, the screen is very good and watching video makes sense of the size of the screen.Rendering speakers (stereo) is better than any other smartphone, but do not is not enough for a prolonged listening The APN is good daylight even though a bit rough on the HDR and the auto contrast Night / in dark environment it's worse but after all, it's only The battery life is excellent in normal use It has a fast charge (65% of the battery in about 30 minutes) The in-ear headphones provided are of good quality, but we regret not having the volume control with the commands.
Pros- Dimensions
- performances
- Photo of day
- Double Sim
- Mono Sim + Micro SD
- Screen quality
Cons- Dimensions
- Volume at the back
- Night photo
View original review- 9.4
- Screen9.3
- Performance10
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.7
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoVery good smartphone but too expensive
Its performances are comparable to an Asus 5'5 sold 200 euros But since it is the only one to have a very large screen, all the frequencies 4g French and a processor not mtk one has no choice ... It n ' Has no big defects but it is medium in performance and memory management requires constant use of the pre installed utility to free up space and prevent it rowing ... A bit shocking for a smartphone At 650 euros At less than 400 euros it would be an excellent value for money
View original review- 8.8
- Screen7.8
- Performance8.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.