you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
- 5.5"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 165 g75.2 mm155.2 mm7.5 mm
- SnapD. 630 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v? 71.200
- 3300 mAh
- 1 12 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 IMX362 Exmor RS 2SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.1.1 Nougat
User score
- 8
- 4
- 2
- 0
- 0
- Screen7.9
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery6.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Performance & Hardware
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Camera
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Connectivity
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 43%Less than a day
- 29%One day
- 29%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
14 reviews
Software
- 7%It comes with a clean operating system
- 57%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 36%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
14 reviews
- 0%Never
- 31%Once a year
- 54%Every six months
- 15%Every two months or less
14 reviews
User reviews
- Asus still is a hardware manufecture, in other words they but the software in a background...
After passed a year the battery capacity still the same!
Pros- Design
- Main Camera
- Battery lifetime
- Performance
Cons- Wide camera
- Software updates
- Security updates
- 8.8
- Screen7.7
- Performance8.5
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt could have been better, especially on drums.
Beautiful device, even nice to use, but some things were done just for the sake of it, for example the Wide Angle is bad, it leaves a very distorted image in the corners, stereo sound in addition to the bass has a low quality, the interface gave some gagging (and it's not my fault from Hardware a Redmi Note 7 with the same SD660 and 4gb of Ram (much more fluid at the time), the loading was too slow even for the standards of the time and the front end could not be used in low light, as it did not look good on the camera at all native.
Pros- Design
- camera software
- Image quality
- Sound in the headphone
Cons- Drums
- wide camera
- Frontal camera
- Loading
- interface optimization
View original review- 7.3
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoPretty cool teledon
Asus and its ZenUi 4.0 is really quite enjoyable and intuitive. The software blootware is small compared to the old Zenfone 5. The camera works, although it is not perfect. Unfortunately, the screen is weak, it is very scratched and it is slightly cracked and damaged, but the digitizer works. Poor for gaming as it has a slow eMMC ROM and little RAM. 64 GB is fast to fill up. Like it has QC 3.0, but the phone is charging slowly. Lack of updates to the latest versions is a very big problem of this company.
Pros- As for 2017, quite decent parameters, but very weak for 2021
Cons- No fast charging despite QC 3.0
- Free eMMC memory
- Little RAM and no NFC in the European version
- Minor security updates and Upgrades
View original review- 5.7
- Screen6.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - 8.8
- Screen7.7
- Performance8.5
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers- 5.5
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery5.0
View answers- 9
- Screen8.3
- Performance9.3
- Camera10
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 year ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.