Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 5"HD64% useful16:9
- 145 g 72.8 mm 148.2 mm 10.0 mm
- Atom Z2520 Dual-Core 2 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 21.982
- 2110 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 Exmor SELF 1.9 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Bands
- 3G4 bands
- 2G4 bands
- Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4.2 KitKat
User score
- 6
- 5
- 1
- 2
- 0
- Screen7.4
- Performance6.8
- Camera6.4
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery3.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
14 opinions
14 opinions
14 opinions
14 opinions
Performance & Hardware
14 opinions
14 opinions
14 opinions
Camera
14 opinions
14 opinions
14 opinions
14 opinions
Connectivity
14 opinions
14 opinions
14 opinions
Battery
- 36%Less than half day
- 43%Less than a day
- 14%One day
- 7%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
14 opinions
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 69%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 31%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
14 opinions
- 21%Never
- 36%Once a year
- 21%Every six months
- 21%Every two months or less
14 opinions
User reviews
User Reviews
- AutoYears and still powerful
The quality of the construction is phenomenal, it restored time and falls very well, the back cover after many years peeled off, several times it became my spare cell phone and is still being used today, of course "forcing the bar", lives in dependence from powebank, out of battery it almost doesn't reach 2 hours, even at the time the battery was its defect. As it is very old it doesn't update anymore, it was a great experience, you saw in practice Asus' dedication in bringing a good experience. The performance in games was something absurd, intermediate cell phones 2 years apart were left behind and a lot. His strong point was the camera, the famous "owl", the artificial intelligence was very lame and you depended on him understanding that it was dark for the button to appear and almost always made mistakes but when you used it it was fantastic, it was a photo in pitch without flash , nowadays it has resources that are equal and even better, but years after the launch I saw it have very good results.
Positives- Materials
- Screen
- Camera
- Performance
Negatives- Battery
- Size
View original opinion- 8.4
- Screen8.5
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoI liked him ...
It was the best smartphone I've had so far (11/04/19). He performed well for games and day to day. The rear camera was good, but the selfie camera I didn't use due to the low resolution. The battery was average. He didn't heat up much when using it. I liked native apps and other Asus apps. At one point Asus released a system update that was not good for him, so I preferred to go back to the original system. Unfortunately I lost it on the street after almost a year of use.
Positives- Screen
- Performance
- Back camera
- Resistance
- Construction
Negatives- Frontal camera
View original opinion- 10
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoStunning phone
A smart phone for your money! Just over 3 years ago I bought it for 6 990, and it's an amazing price for a phone with such features and capabilities. So much time has passed, and now he is already an "old man", but will give a head start to half of modern smartphones. The camera is gorgeous! All very clearly removes, even in the dark! Its only drawback is the battery (If you actively use it, even for a day is not enough (
View original opinion- 10
- Screen10
- Performance9.3
- Camera10
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - 8.3
- Screen8.3
- Performance8.7
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity7.7
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
Score
no Ki
- 3.2 Design & Materials
- 2.9 Performance & Hardware
- 3.9 Camera
- 2.6 Connectivity
- 2.4 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.