you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Asus ZenFone Live reviews by real users Asus ZenFone Live
- 5"LCD IPSHD16:9
- 120 g71.7 mm141.2 mm8.0 mm
- SnapD. 410 Quad-Core 2 GB RAM 32 GB
- v? 25.200
- 2650 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 SELF 4.9 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow
User score
- 1
- 3
- 1
- 0
- 3
- Screen7.3
- Performance6.1
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity6.7
- Battery3.9
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Performance & Hardware
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Camera
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Connectivity
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Battery
- 38%Less than half day
- 25%Less than a day
- 38%One day
- 0%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
8 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 75%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 25%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
8 reviews
- 43%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 57%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
8 reviews
User reviews
- It Tried
If you're a heavy user, don't go for this phone. It's good for social media though, decent to good photos in good lighting conditions, great speakers and it was loud. After a month of use, you could start feeling it getting slower. The RAM was poorly managed, and hanged a lot once you spend more than 30 minutes using any app in general. The battery drained fast, even with the screen at 20% brightness. It also had screen burn ins that would take hours to recover. The phone was also very light, due to it's all plastic build which also made it fragile. It could handle light games, but try running anything heavy and it will hang and eventually crash the app or the phone itself would crash. To conclude everything, the fact that it had more cons and it had pros made it hard to use the phone, even with restricted use.
Pros- Good Camera
- Loud Speaker
- Good For Social Media Lovers
Cons- Screen Burn In's
- Poor Battery Life
- Poor RAM management
- Became Slow after a Month
- Fragile Build
- 0.5
- Screen4.0
- Performance3.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoApparatus for basic use
I took this device used for 200 reais, while my top of the line does not arrive, and is serving me well, I can use some apps and run the face and normal messenger without being the good lite, I have not tested any game because I know it will be frustrating, but for basic use it was the best option I found, I just felt crashes in google chrome, the device is very light, this is very good for everyday life !!
Pros- Lightweight
- 4G
- Asus
Cons- Battery
- Cameras
- Too many installed apps
View original review- 7.8
- Screen8.0
- Performance6.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - 0
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery0.0
View answers- AutoMeets
Yes it is a reasonable phone day by day if you are not demanding ... the camera the best way to take pictures is to put the camera in night mode or low light otherwise in all situations the photos come out horrible.other thing the battery download fast using data network.GPS I needed once in a trip left me in the hand several times lost the signal and had to stay turning on and off the location and the highway is very dangerous I passed entries and had to return I got lost a few times warm It seems like it's going to explode, I do not like it. I have to click on mp3, Bluetooth, etc. apps without belittling it. I expected more from it. but the good of him he is very fast the design of him is beautiful.more only I will finish paying and buy another.
View original review- 6.6
- Screen8.0
- Performance7.5
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity4.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - Autothe camera is horrible !!!
the device satisfies those who only intend to make use of it for basic everyday things, but the camera is a disappointing factor. So if you're the kind of person who likes to take photos, this smartphone is not a good option.
Pros- Battery
- internal memory
- Design
Cons- camera
View original review- 4.4
- Screen7.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera1.8
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 8.8
- Screen7.8
- Performance7.7
- Camera6.8
- Connectivity7.7
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.