you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Bluboo Picasso reviews by real users Bluboo Picasso
- 5"LCD IPSHD16:9
- 152 g70.0 mm142.0 mm8.2 mm
- MT6580 Quad-Core 2 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 20.918
- 2500 mAh
- 1 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 GC5005 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Bands
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop
User score
- 4
- 5
- 1
- 2
- 1
- Screen7.0
- Performance5.9
- Camera5.3
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery6.9
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Performance & Hardware
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Camera
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Connectivity
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Battery
- 8%Less than half day
- 15%Less than a day
- 38%One day
- 38%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
13 reviews
Software
- 23%It comes with a clean operating system
- 62%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 15%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
13 reviews
- 8%Never
- 15%Once a year
- 15%Every six months
- 15%Every two months or less
13 reviews
User reviews
- Cheap Chinajunk
I had problems right from start, battery emptied from 100% to 0% in minutes. After couple months screen went black and phone became useless. i can hear phone booting and that i got new messages but screen stays black.
I know it was cheap but i ordered this model because Bluboo advertised it as tough and unbreakable model, they even released video where they throw it around and dropped it from 2nd floor... So stay away from and buy from other manufacturer!Pros- price was nice
Cons- everything except price
- 0
- Screen2.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera2.8
- Connectivity4.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - Cheap smartphone, easy to root!
Elegant but made from plastic.
Almost excellent display, perfect touch, thin, good for one hand handling.
Biggest disadvantages are poor speakers and low quality microphone.Pros- Connectivity
- Display
- Elegance
Cons- Sound
- 7.4
- Screen7.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera4.8
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Good bang for the buck
It's a nice cheap phone, with 2gbram and 16gb rom for less than 70euros. I bought it from a chinese reseller, who apparently filled it with malware, i had to format it and reflash a new rom. A good everyday phone, only buy from trusted sellers tho.
Pros- price
- ok for everyday use
Cons- no gaming
- no custom roms
- 7.3
- Screen7.0
- Performance5.5
- Camera3.8
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - Cheap phone, OK performance (great for the price), Touch screen stopped working without falling or a broken screen
beautiful, nice performance for the price, best characteristics for the price range ok screen, mediocre camera, bad low light photos
cant hear it ring (need the vibration to realise sb is calling),
fell once and there were many scratches on the sides but phone kept working (even the side "metal" broke at one place), the heigh of the fall wasnt big (~60 cm).
two months later (non related in my opinion) touchscreen started to not work well. almost a month it was really problematic with 3-5 minutes of downtime everytime the screen became unresponsive.
This resulted to the phone's screen stopping working after a low battery turn-off.
total time owned about 6 monthsPros- cheap price
Cons- built quality
- bad audio quality
- really low sound
- 3.9
- Screen6.3
- Performance5.0
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.