you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
BQ Aquaris V reviews by real users BQ Aquaris V
- 5.2"LCD IPSHD16:9
- 165 g73.0 mm148.1 mm8.4 mm
- SnapD. 435 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 41.000
- 3100 mAh
- 1 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX386 Exmor RS SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo
User score
- Screen8.3
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity8.2
- Battery8.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Performance & Hardware
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Camera
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Connectivity
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 50%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
4 reviews
Software
- 25%It comes with a clean operating system
- 75%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
4 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 75%Every six months
- 25%Every two months or less
4 reviews
User reviews
- AutoAn interesting mobile but somewhat scarce
After more than a year of use (since January 2018), it is a mobile phone that has always been fulfilled. However, I do see that the 2 GB of RAM limit a lot to some games. I have not noticed slowdowns with normal use. The battery can last quietly one day with a normal use, without demanding in things like games that can consume more or watching excessive videos. The day camera is fine for a mobile in this segment, although at night it can be improved. Finally, although being common in Android, it comes with many Google applications, many of which you may not want to use. For example, to view the photos you are forced to use Google Photos since it does not bring a gallery. I would recommend taking at least 3GB of RAM and 32GB of Hard Disk. Less is very possible that is missing.
Pros- Design
- Size
Cons- Low speaker sound
- Something scarce memories
View original review- 7.7
- Screen8.3
- Performance6.3
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoGood mobile, which satisfies satisfactorily.
It is a great terminal that does not disappoint when it comes to working with it. In spite of being HD, the screen looks very good, maybe it lacks some sound, but it does not really affect me, and in silence it goes perfectly. 32 Storage, it leaves me calm in terms of the capacity of use and storage.The capacitive buttons, I would have liked them to be luminous.They are screen-printed and they look very good but at night, the luminosity is strange. a night navigation bar on the screen that replaces it and is not bad.The battery day and a half quietly.
Pros- LTE Global LATAM connectivity (4G worldwide)
- Fluency
- Battery
- Fast charge
- The pictures
Cons- Sound
- Micro USB type C charging terminal. Perhaps.
View original review- 10
- Screen8.5
- Performance7.0
- Camera9.8
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 8.9
- Screen7.8
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity7.7
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.