you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 5.2"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 158 g72.7 mm146.2 mm7.8 mm
- SnapD. 626 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v7 82.638
- 3100 mAh
- 1 12 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 2L7 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo
User score
- 19
- 5
- 2
- 3
- 3
- Screen7.9
- Performance7.7
- Camera7.9
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Performance & Hardware
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Camera
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Connectivity
32 reviews
32 reviews
32 reviews
Battery
- 3%Less than half day
- 13%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 50%More than one day
- 9%Two days or more
32 reviews
Software
- 53%It comes with a clean operating system
- 34%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 13%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
32 reviews
- 9%Never
- 19%Once a year
- 22%Every six months
- 50%Every two months or less
32 reviews
User reviews
- inconstant experience
for now ,ive been using this phone for over a month and i can say it's a very beautiful phone ,similar to the iphone X with shiny glass in the back ,but it slippery and easy to scratch , a 2.5D glass and some type of protection on the front ,the phone comes with a stock android with a snappy experience but some times the system can be a bit laggy even for such a powerful SOC ,as for the cameras , i gotta be honest the main camera is good but cant say more than that ,the color is a bit washed out and they are not vibrant ,on the contrary the front camera is much better with the colors and sharpness ,the battery is good get me through the day with moderate use with a SOT of 6-7 hours and if you want to juice up there always that QC3.0 with type C to fill you up in just an hour and half,overall the phone is very good for moderate users with a very good selfie shouter for selfie lover
Pros- SOC (SD626)
- Selfie Camera
- Battery
- Design
- Type C with QC3.0
- Stock Android
Cons- Back Camera
- 8.6
- Screen8.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt gave me good service for 4 years (with 4 GB of RAM) but the years weigh on it, I'm going to change it
It gave me good service for 4 years (with its 4 GB of RAM in 2017 it was top) but the years weigh on it, I'm going to change it
Pros- RAM 4 GB
- Good day photos
- Rear fingerprint reader
- NFC for payments
Cons- Night photos
- Selfie camera
- Get stuck with today's heavy applications
View original review- 5.9
- Screen4.7
- Performance5.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - 5.9
- Screen6.5
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoAt first well, it already falls short
At first it was going well, but it quickly falls short. Storage almost never arrives, the battery has a hard time supporting the whole day, and the camera every 2 * 3 bursts, and it does not save the photos you think you have taken. Not to mention the updates, which we have been waiting for more than a year for that Android 9 Pie, which seeing that its page has been down for a week, we do not wait for a joke. I would not buy anything from this brand that has come down.
Pros- Quality photos when you take them.
Cons- performance
- Battery
- OS
View original review- 2
- Screen7.7
- Performance5.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoHe promised more than he actually delivered.
After some pretty good experiences with other bq models, this was a real sad fiasco. The camera that promised to be exceptional, especially for night photos, was not good at all and at night terrible. The general fluidity was conspicuous by its absence, the screen and everything else were very ordinary. In general and due to the sale price, even with some good offer, it was excessively overvalued, even more so compared to the rest of the models of other brands. I couldn't bear it for half a year.
View original review- 3
- Screen5.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera4.0
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoMobile very practical and good quality-price when I bought it.
Its design is attractive but as always for tastes colors, in a year it has not failed me anything and it is still as fluid as the first day, even with 30 apps and thousands of more photos, in summary a mobile phone of 9.5 out of 10 with very few sticks, the only one that I put is that the battery could last longer but before (a year ago), there was the same technology that is coming now. Although there was already fast charging so no problem :).
Pros- Camera
- screen
- Processor
- Fast charge
- Flash
- Esthetic
Cons- Battery
- Cleaning
View original review- 9.6
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.