- 5.2"FHD69% useful16:9
- 166 g 72.8 mm 148.0 mm 8.5 mm
- MT6737 Quad-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v? 39.890
- 2800 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 IMX135 Exmor RS SELF 13.1 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.0 Nougat
Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 44%Less than half day
- 22%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 0%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
- 67%It comes with a clean operating system
- 33%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 50%Once a year
- 33%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
- AutoExcellent value for money
I bought it the first time in 2018, for my wife: she is still using it with satisfaction. A few months ago the smartphone I had (Ngm brand) went, and then I bought another Cubot Note Plus for me, and I have been using it for 6 months. I too am satisfied with it: it works on a more than discreet level in everything. Fingerprint recognition is fast and almost foolproof. Its flaw is the battery that is not very good: one day it does it quietly, even more, but in two days it never comes. On the other hand, it has the great advantage - rare today! - of having the removable battery (very easily) so I bought a spare battery (at 12 euros) that I always carry with me, with the advantage that, in case, it can be used both me that to my wife! Finally, they give it to you with a transparent silicone case, excellent and resistant. Ultimately, for less than 100 euros, I don't think it is very easy to find something better, with 3 GB of memory and 32 RAM! I absolutely recommend it!Positives
- Price, removable battery, fingerprint recognition
- Underpowered battery, just enough room
- AutoBest among budget for every day.
This phone experienced dozens of drops on asphalt, iron plates, water and the like at work. It is the best everyday phone. I bought it first as soon as it came out. The dialer did not work. An update came and everything went back to normal. Then two more updates. I killed him with my own hands and I feel sorry for him.Positives
- For its price, everything is great.
- AutoGood memory, beautiful screen, but fragile. Reasonable camera and lousy battery.
Very bad performance, over time comes to present inexplicable crashes, the rom has bugs. Camera is less than expected, and the battery drains in a short time. In addition to heating horrors, wall will catch fire. And screen is extremely fragile, in addition to the cell phone body made of plastic. What saves is the price. Although you have better options at the same value.Positives
- HD screen +
- Front flash and notification led
- victor-manuel-manzano-serrador-5a808d701be6bCubot Note Plus3GB · 32GBAutoCompact mobile
Mobile compact and very manageable, correct camera, good screen, good audio, good experience of pure android weighted by a battery that is somewhat short and it takes more than four hours to charge 100% leaving you 2 hours without mobile, charging slowest I saw in my life. An undemanding user would arrive at the end of the day and put it all night to charge and ready
- AutoI like it but it has flaws
The quality of the screen is remarkable but if you put more resolution of 480p on YouTube the mobile does not support it and the video is flawed, as the sound goes smoothly but the video lags a lot. In terms of battery also weak enough because in 4h approx my battery has run out, but are of continuous use, in basic use can last up to 1 day.Positives
- Screen 5.2 "
- It comes with a case
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 5.7 Design & Materials
- 4.6 Performance & Hardware
- 5.8 Camera
- 3.5 Connectivity
- 3.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.