you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Cubot Pocket reviews by real users Cubot Pocket
- Ki Cost-effective Score6
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Design
- NFC
- Price
Cons- Updates
- Camera quality
- Fragile
- No 5G
- 4"LCD IPSLowRes18:9
- 128 g58.0 mm119.0 mm12.5 mm
- Unisoc Tiger T310 Quad-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v9 143.170
- 3000 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake Android 11
User score
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.5
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
1 review
1 review
1 review
Performance & Hardware
1 review
1 review
Camera
1 review
1 review
1 review
Connectivity
1 review
1 review
1 review
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 0%One day
- 100%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
1 review
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
1 review
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 0%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
1 review
User reviews
- AutoIn general, this smartphone fully corresponds to the stated characteristics.
However, there are a few caveats. 1. There is no fast charging; there is no indication of it either in the status bar or anywhere else on the screen. The included power adapter produces 6 - 7 watts instead of the promised 10 watts. During the first 20 minutes of charging, the battery receives only 12-15% of its capacity. 2. Charging stops when 50-60% of the battery capacity is reached, after reconnection it continues until fully charged. This is, of course, not normal. Is there a solution to this problem in the battery settings? If so, please clarify. 3. The smartphone does not support VoLTE technology when operating in 4G. Immediately after inserting the SIM card into the smartphone, I received an SMS from the provider warning that due to the order of the Ministry of Communications, this device will NOT be serviced from January 1, 2025.
View original review- 7.3
- Screen7.6
- Performance7.5
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 7 months ago
- Pros & Cons 9 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Market, Features 1 year ago
- Fingerprint 1 year ago
- Thickness 1 year ago
- Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
- Width, Height, Weight, Inches, Resolution, Resolution, Density, Capacity (mAh), Aspect Ratio, RAM, Resolution 1 year ago
Score
- 4.5 Design & Materials
- 5.2 Performance & Hardware
- 4.7 Camera
- 5.5 Connectivity
- 4.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.