you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 5.71"LCD IPSHD+18:9
- 340 g80.2 mm161.0 mm18.3 mm
- Helio P22 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 128 GB
- v8 95.000
- 10050 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 S5K2P7 234SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 10 Q Android 10
User score
- Screen5.9
- Performance5.8
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.7
- Battery9.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Performance & Hardware
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Camera
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Connectivity
2 reviews
2 reviews
2 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 0%One day
- 50%More than one day
- 50%Two days or more
2 reviews
Software
- 50%It comes with a clean operating system
- 50%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
2 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 100%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
2 reviews
User reviews
- A budget phone perfect for those who want a tough, unbreakable device with the longest possible battery life.
The Doodgee S59 Pro is essentially an entry level, budget version of their high end devices of which this phone only inherits the incredible durability and battery life found in Doogee's more expensive phones. Although it takes pretty good photos, has a decent screen and sound, AND sports 128GB storage, the 4GB ram is a real drawback combined with the slow and mediocre (but cheap to use) MTK Hellio P22 Soc/chipset. Overall with this phone you enjoy the storage, battery life and unbreakable durability but start thinking about the higher end of Doogee's line up, chasing snappy performance.
- 7.4
- Screen9.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - AutoAttention poor phone quality, not resistant to basic shocks!
Hello I bought this phone less than six months ago, after a fall, simple and without momentum (coffee table) the screen broke! It is presented as ultra resistant, whereas I believe it does not even deserve the designation "shockproof" that one makes of it. I am extremely disappointed, and without a phone because there are pieces of glass protruding everywhere ... Obviously, the intermediary salesman of Cdiscount, is unreachable, and no one will see me a phone again! I thought I had chosen a quality telephone and I end up with a "chinoiserie" whose quality is only matched by its after-sales service. count on me to let it be known, I don't wish anyone to end up in my situation. Mr Poulain d'Albi, France.
View original review- 3.9
- Screen2.7
- Performance5.6
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 year ago
- Features 2 years ago
Score
- 5.8 Design & Materials
- 5.0 Performance & Hardware
- 5.4 Camera
- 6.6 Connectivity
- 9.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.