you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Gigabyte GSmart Classic Joy reviews by real users GSmart Classic Joy
- 5"LCD IPSHD16:9
- 132 g71.0 mm143.0 mm8.1 mm
- SC7731 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM 8 GB
- v5 17.700
- 2200 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · Unknow SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Bands
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop
User score
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 0
- Screen6.8
- Performance6.7
- Camera5.8
- Connectivity7.2
- Battery7.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Performance & Hardware
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Camera
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Connectivity
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 40%Less than a day
- 0%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 20%Two days or more
5 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
5 reviews
- 40%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 20%Every six months
- 20%Every two months or less
5 reviews
User reviews
- this mobile phone is good. i like it.
good design, connectivity and battery life, but, low RAM and internal memory, this mobile phone can be better and faster if was with 2 GB RAM and 16 GB internal memory. installed applications you can put it on SD memory card. stand-by time can vary, 7-15 days, it depends how you use it him. battery life may vary based on cellular network, location, signal strength, feature configurations, phone usage, and many other factors. for usage without stopping, for example: if you use facebook, from 100 % - 0 %, his battery last till 5 hours. charging of the battery is 1,5 - 2 hours.
Pros- good battery and connectivity
- good stand-by time
- good quality of daytime photos and selfie
- good call quality, and his speaker sound very loud
Cons- RAM and internal memory
- bad quality of nighttime selfie
- 9.6
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.3
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - AutoThe screen is great, the rest of mediocrity.
Bright, full screen with maximum viewing angles without distortion. Call is not convenient - does not work the proximity sensor. He is not. Instead, the sensor can be pressed against the cheek, sometimes the screen goes well. The test shows that the sensor responds to touching the glass. As a planner, mp3 player quite fit. The battery is eating very modestly, speaker sound very loud, though dominated by high frequencies. Camera garbage. Thin, light, comfortable size. The price is not justified. It Was Arc x5 max- overly cumbersome, gsmart essence - the camera and the battery and the screen is worse.
View original review- 4.6
- Screen5.3
- Performance5.0
- Camera2.3
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.