you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
- 6.4"LCD IPSQHD16:9
- 259 g88.6 mm179.8 mm10.7 mm
- SnapD. 652 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v6 81.000
- 4050 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 2SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow
User score
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.7
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Performance & Hardware
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Camera
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Connectivity
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 25%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 25%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
4 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 75%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 25%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
4 reviews
- 25%Never
- 25%Once a year
- 25%Every six months
- 25%Every two months or less
4 reviews
User reviews
- Most convenient phone I used
I am using my second Lenovo Phab 2 Pro. First one I sold about 6 months ago. And than came back.
In the meanwhile I tried Xiaomi Mix (with same 6.4" display size) and other phablets (iPhone 6s plus, Xiaomi Mix 2, Xiaomi Mix 2S, Xiaomi 5 plus, Nexus 6P) but this is still just great.
Display on this Phab 2 Pro is just gorgeous. It is so good.
Complete phone is one large piece of engineering. Pictures are very good, battery as it should be. Everything is just fine but Lenovo's support.
Lenovo decided not to go out with Android 7. They just left users. This sucks big time. However, I bought new Phab 2 Pro last week as secondary daily driver (beside Pixel 2 XL).Pros- screen
- quality
- build
Cons- No updates
- No community
- Lenovo sucks
- Very sensitive casing
- 9
- Screen8.0
- Performance10
- Camera7.3
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt is an excellent machine, but it is expensive and a bit cumbersome
I have been with it for 3 years, and for it to last me so long it is because it is super resistant and endured. I put a very simple protectos that I bought in line and it has resisted everything, falls, blows, what it does not hold is water. It has good memory and I expanded it to 128GB. It has good access and speed to memory In Line, Data and Wifi connectivity it far exceeds other brands that I have (and more recent ones) such as Motorola, Blade, Zoom and another one. I liked it a lot and it is quite functional for me. A good sized keyboard can be fitted to it. The rear camera gives problems, after a while it no longer focuses well, and for the video it focuses worse. The movies are SUPER. The price is SUPER-HIGH
Pros- Performance
- Resistance
- screen
- Frontal camera
Cons- Rear camera
- The price
View original review- 9.1
- Screen7.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoMedium-high quality device with amazing benefits thanks to its Tango function.
Large mobile device and power. I like his touch as much as the finishes. His 6.4 '' screen amazes me. Once adapted to him I do not change it for another one, except with screen of 5 '' or superior since it helps to put it in the pocket of the pants. Its Tango technology is perfect for my work with architecture, taking measurements, or mapping a space in 3 dimensions, before downloading specific applications. The battery goes away in hours using a Tango cap or augmented reality. In a nutshell, I do not know when I use it and / or discover new utilities. Mobile recommended, especially for engineering and / or architecture professionals.
Pros- TANGO
- 2K screen
- Battery
- Image quality
Cons- Size
- Battery in use of Tango or AR
- Night photos
View original review- 9.9
- Screen8.8
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoAesthetics excellent. Acceptable performance. Insufficient flash. It warms up with TANGO quite a bit.
Since I saw it was love at first sight, so I can say that I am very objective with negative reviews. The touch is spectacular. Between that, the screen with the image quality (not the brightness), and a performance that unless you go for something exclusive premium does not disappoint, you feel that you have in your hands the best mobile phone in the world (even if it is not) . It weighs a lot. It is more than 1/4 kg. It ends up being noticed. Using it with two hands is imperative so that you do not fall for making the grace that you can handle it with 1 hand (no, you can not). It's great to have ample space for widgets, to work with the mobile, and even to do tests with augmented reality. At some point the sound has made me a stranger if I had to download the audio in real time, the quality is regular. If the weight does not matter to you, and you do not need a last-generation mobile, this is certainly one you will not forget. For me it is a compromise between tablet and mobile to work
Pros- Screen size
- Finished
- Value for money
- Augmented reality
- Screen resolution
Cons- Battery (5h usage = 60%)
- Temperature with TANGO ON
- Weight
- Bevels and margins
- Very weak flash
- Quality night shots
View original review- 7.9
- Screen7.8
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.8
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.