you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 6.55"LCD IPSHD+19:9
- 194 g76.7 mm165.2 mm8.2 mm
- Helio P35 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 64 GB
- v8 103.115
- 4000 mAh
- 1 32 Mpx · Unknow 234SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 9.0 P Android 9.0 P
User score
- 3
- 3
- 5
- 1
- 1
- Screen7.1
- Performance6.2
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity7.7
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Performance & Hardware
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Camera
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Connectivity
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 8%Less than a day
- 54%One day
- 31%More than one day
- 8%Two days or more
13 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 92%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 8%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
13 reviews
- 18%Never
- 36%Once a year
- 36%Every six months
- 9%Every two months or less
13 reviews
User reviews
- AutoHalf
Low-end mobile. The only thing that I can partially rescue would be its design, battery and resistance. Just to save your battery since the cell phone does not consume so much energy and it lasts a long time even though I have 4000mAh. Its use is totally and exclusively for undemanding users, who are not interested in installing applications that require the power of the processor. It is also not recommended to use it for gaming, since its mediatek helio P35 chip is simply very underperforming. Use for messages, calls and a few other photos and simple applications.
Pros- Design
- Battery
- Endurance
Cons- very bad processor
- very slow multitasking
- Very limited gaming performance
- Very low quality screen
- poor quality materials
- no update
View original review- 5
- Screen8.0
- Performance4.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt's good for simple daily use
It's good for simple daily use, in actions that don't demand much from the processor, the screen is simple and basic, the battery is very durable when new. It is quite resistant to falls, the cameras are good, but simple, without many functions.
Pros- Resistance
- Battery
- Beauty
Cons- Processor
- Camera
- Screen
View original review- 6
- Screen6.0
- Performance2.6
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt is a good cell phone for people of 35 years
It's good I really liked the design but I don't recommend LG cell phones ._.XD the camera is cool but the night photos are crap and the processor has worked well but it lags at times but the mid-range would be a bad option for teenagers 15 years old: v
Pros- pretty
- camera
Cons- the processor is just there for games
- night photos look bad
View original review- 5
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - Autogood for everyday
It has a nice design and fluidity, so far that I have tried it everything has gone well in my normal day, the only thing that I could object to is the power for how many games, the P40 is not as powerful for games, but it is average for me, for example playing Call of duty Mobile. In the camera section, the camera software leaves something to be desired, not pointing to bad things, it happens more with the selfie camera. The speakers sound a bit low for music, but as a day-to-day mobile, I think it's fine.
View original review- 6.6
- Screen6.7
- Performance6.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt's moderately good ...
The phone is good in regards to the screen, I think it is a good ips screen, also the software, sound, battery and in the same way the camera in the day, because at night it is a tremendous garbage and worst of all it is your processor that does not meet for basic tasks. On the other hand, the resistance to falls complies in a good way without breaking or scratching. In conclusion, the phone is good for a fairly basic basic use because if you demand it, it starts to stay largely.
View original review- 5.1
- Screen7.5
- Performance5.0
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.7 Design & Materials
- 4.9 Performance & Hardware
- 4.8 Camera
- 5.5 Connectivity
- 5.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.