- 5.5"LCD IPSFHD+18:9
- 145 g69.3 mm143.8 mm8.4 mm
- MT6750 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v7 68.913
- 3000 mAh
- 1 15.9 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/1.9
- Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo
User score
Design & Materials
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Performance & Hardware
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Camera
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Connectivity
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Battery
- 50%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 0%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
4 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
4 reviews
- 100%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 0%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
4 reviews
User reviews
- AutoEntry-level device at a premium mid-range price
I haven't felt such a good device for receiving calls for a long time, you could hear and speak clearly in a very busy place, for example shopping, street and etc, one of the most ergonomic cell phones I've used to date, the 5 screen, 5 was ideal for everyday use, few edges in full screen and its full hd+ resolution was something very immersive. So why such a low score? Because everything else was bad, of poor quality and they disqualified all the strong points, starting with the chipset mediatek mt line which is the input of the input, much worse than the snapdragon line 400, it crashed a lot, even with apps on the device itself, and this drained the battery even more, which is not a big deal, besides being small, it did not support the system, and add that to outdated ram and rom, despite 4/64 they were extremely slow, the interface was simple, rustic and poorly optimized, the cameras they looked interpolated, and the military certificate fell apart as it scratched so easily.
Pros- call sign
- Ergonomics
- full hd+ resolution
- Screen 5.5 slim body
Cons- bad chipset
- Bad hardware, very slow
- Small battery, drained very fast
- bad cameras
- scratch with happiness
View original review- 0.8
- Screen7.2
- Performance2.3
- Camera1.7
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoIf it doesn't exist it wouldn't be missed
Positive point: Very ergonomic for the day-to-day, quality and signal of the connection is something that surprises. End of praise. Lamented by the lack of purposeful information he should have come with a snapdragon but they traded it for a low cost mediatek. Negative points: The sound of bad cars but you can survive, I don't know why to put 4gb ram / 64gb rom if it's the worst on the market, access is too slow, in any scenario of use, processing is shameful, slow, bad managed, adding the low battery you drain easily arriving at noon you despair for charging and it’s slow it takes a long time to fully charge, the cameras I don’t even need to have, it’s so bad that you don’t even want to take a picture, ask anybody person who is on your side who will do better. I would be ashamed to say that it has a military certificate, it even resists well, but it is to put in your pocket and scratch and be branded. Did I mention it's slow and lousy with autonomy?
Pros- Ergonomics
- Wide resolution
- Calls sign
Cons- Screen
- External files
- Battery
- Memoirs
- Processing
- Cameras (all)
View original review- 1
- Screen7.7
- Performance2.6
- Camera2.2
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoVery comfortable
It is a phone that I have recently and so far has performed very well. Personally I do not use it to have heavy applications and games, it is not a work tool. I have the discomfort that until the day of the date in Arg I find no cover and tempado.
Pros- Excellent design
- It is compact and comfortable
- The camera meets the expectation
- It has portrait mode in the front camera
- 64GB
- Fast charge
Cons- The sound hole is badly located, it covers easily
- Type C input, not the universal charger in Arg
- The lid scratches easily
- The metal gets very hot by demanding too much
View original review- 8.2
- Screen8.5
- Performance6.5
- Camera7.3
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoThe bad of the Smartphone are 3 things even so the terminal is very acceptable and what I love most about this phone is the ip68 certification
The bad things 1._ The battery: It is bad I do not deny it BUT it is justified to have USB type c and fast charge 2._ The processor: In this section I accept that it is not the best, a Snapdragon 625 or at most a 636 it would have been bad even if the processor it carries is acceptable. 3._ The price: Still, I think the price is high for what the terminal performs. (I do not say that it does poorly but in that aspect it could improve a lot) What I love about this team is that for the first time you do not have to buy a rugged terminal or a high range to immerse it. Thanks to your ip68 certification. For my opinion I think it is the most complete terminal of the mid-range the only thing that does not deserve is terminal is the processor if it had a helium terminal p25 or a Snapdragon 625 or at most the 636 would undoubtedly be the best mid-range smartphone
View original review- 9.2
- Screen9.8
- Performance8.7
- Camera7.3
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.