you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the LG V40 ThinQ
- 6.4"pOLEDWQHD+19.5:9
- 169 g75.8 mm158.7 mm7.7 mm
- SnapD. 845 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 64 GB
- v? 275.000
- 3300 mAh
- 1 12 Mpx · ƒ/1.5 23SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/1.9
- Android 10 Q Android 10
User score
- 13
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.1
- Camera8.9
- Connectivity8.9
- Battery6.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Performance & Hardware
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Camera
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Connectivity
14 reviews
14 reviews
14 reviews
Battery
- 14%Less than half day
- 14%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 21%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
14 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
14 reviews
- 15%Never
- 38%Once a year
- 46%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
14 reviews
User reviews
- My first proper flagship
My 1st proper flagship from any manufacturer. Bought used obviously.
Bought as a replacement to Meizu 16x that suddenly has camera malfunction, so not able to get any autofocus. Generally I still prefer Meizu 16x due to notchlessess design, compact body and excellent video OIS. And battery life is excellent even with 3100mAh.
Better on LG v40; wide angle camera, marginally faster processor, excellent sound >Boombox speaker, Quad DAC , DTS surround, 3.5mm Jack, come with earphone inside box. Micro SD slot. Thanks LG. Amoled screen is nice too but not better than Meizu 16x. A lottttt of customization but strangely no gesture type of navigation.
Bad points> Poor battery life even worst than smaller capacity battery in Meizu 16x and Meizu x8. No obvious advantage of QHD resolution, even make battery life worsen, luckily can switch to FHD. Non programmable Google button. Poor front camera and zoom camera quality, no proper night mode, video stabilization no very effective.Pros- Amoled screen
- Back camera
- Boombox speaker
- Quad DAC
- Earphone jack
- Rear fingerprint
Cons- Front camera
- Battery life
- Pointless QHD resolution
- Google button
- OIS not so effective
- No proper night mode
- 9.3
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoBalanced
It is a phone, it has great qualities. The problem at the time was that LG neglected the updates a lot, it reached Android 10 when it should have reached Android 11 and the LG UX menu, although very practical, was thrown out of innovation and news. The battery and fast charging are not its forte either.
Pros- cameras
- Video
- Screen
- Audio
- Power
- Endurance
Cons- updates
- Drums
- Fast charge
View original review- 8.5
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoVery good
Very good battery gives 8 hours of screen, with data gives 5 to 6 hours of screen... The screen is beautiful, the touch screen has good hz, the sound is very complete even better than an s20 comparing it in person, the footprint could be below, the google assistance button should be customizable, the vibration is very good, on Netflix you can see everything in high definition
Pros- Screen
- cameras
- Sound
- Battery
- Yield of 9
Cons- ota updates
- best support
- LG layer can be more customizable
View original review- 8.7
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoPerfectly meets the quality and price
I want cell phones for games mainly and the truth is that with this cell phone I don't have a single complaint, the power it offers you is more than enough to play in high graphic quality and at about 30 fps. The only bad thing that I can highlight is the battery, playing guarantees you two hours minimum. I plan to buy an external battery case and with that it would be perfect.
Pros- Camera
- Power
- Storage
- Fluids
- Screen
- Price
Cons- Battery
View original review- 9.9
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery0.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- Operating System 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- New opinion 1 year ago
Score
- 6.8 Design & Materials
- 5.9 Performance & Hardware
- 6.4 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 4.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.