you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 4.3"LCD IPSLowRes16:9
- 142 g64.8 mm124.8 mm12.3 mm
- SnapD. 200 Dual-Core 1 GB RAM 4 GB
- v? 12.722
- 1980 mAh
- 1 5 Mpx · Unknow SELF 0 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Bands
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1.1 Lollipop
User score
- 4
- 9
- 8
- 3
- 3
- Screen6.4
- Performance5.2
- Camera2.5
- Connectivity7.5
- Battery5.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Performance & Hardware
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Camera
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Connectivity
27 reviews
27 reviews
27 reviews
Battery
- 19%Less than half day
- 19%Less than a day
- 48%One day
- 15%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
27 reviews
Software
- 22%It comes with a clean operating system
- 67%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 11%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
27 reviews
- 41%Never
- 41%Once a year
- 14%Every six months
- 5%Every two months or less
27 reviews
User reviews
- AutoI do not recommend or give it away.
My opinion is about the current use that it can have. For its time it was a cell phone that lasted a long time, despite its poor 4GB storage, the phone lasted me until 2016, it was a good experience despite how limited it was even for the year I stopped using it.
Pros- Portable and comfortable
- pure android
- Resistant to splashes of water and scratches
Cons- Bad performance currently
- It does not have an LED flash.
- poor memory
- Bad updates (Lollipop arrived in 2017)
View original review- 4.5
- Screen6.5
- Performance3.6
- Camera4.0
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt's the worst thing I ever had.
Screen: It is as bad as the Motorola Moto C, there is not much to say here, I just say that it is terrible. Battery: I had a problem: it was so bad that within minutes, even with 100% it turned off and read 0%. Camera: I don't think it's good. Summary: Junk physics.
View original review- 1.7
- Screen3.0
- Performance1.6
- Camera2.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoGreat for the year you buy it and it's still a trusted cell phone
It is a very good cell phone, but it has a battery that is consumed fast with high yields. It overheat; Over time the buttons get to fail. But it holds falls, scratches up to a certain extent the water. Recommended to use social networks calmly, although its screen is not good for reading by low light and size of letters
Pros- Resistance to blows, falls and water
- Easy to use
- Good geolocation
- Compatible with games that do not have high demand
Cons- Small screen
- Weight
View original review- 7.9
- Screen6.5
- Performance5.7
- Camera2.3
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoBad but good at the price that was sold
It's a phone that went old for when it appeared in Argentina (2013-14) but at a price at that time unbeatable, $ 4000 pesos, you did not buy anything for that money and with the backing that even Google was the owner of Motorola. After changing hands and users suffered the process, since it originally came with Android 4.2.2, it went to 4.4.2, 4.4.4 and finally to the poorly polished and slow 5.1. At that time for the price you bought a galaxy ace.
Pros- Volume and quality speaker
- Screen and its brightness in the sun
- Quality construction Anti blows
- Splash resistance
- Gorilla Glass 3
- Excelent sound
Cons- Without flash
- Without autofocus
- Terrible camera
- Very heavy
- Only 2GB free for user
- Anchored in Android 5.1
View original review- 7.6
- Screen5.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera0.8
- Connectivity8.7
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 year ago
Score
- 4.6 Design & Materials
- 4.6 Performance & Hardware
- 4.6 Camera
- 4.6 Connectivity
- 4.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.