you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto E4 Plus reviews by real users Motorola Moto E4 Plus
- 5.5"LCD IPSHD16:9
- 198 g77.5 mm155.0 mm9.6 mm
- MT6737 Quad-Core 3 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 34.000
- 5000 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.1.1 Nougat
User score
- 19
- 22
- 9
- 4
- 5
- Screen6.6
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity7.8
- Battery8.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
59 reviews
59 reviews
59 reviews
59 reviews
Performance & Hardware
59 reviews
59 reviews
59 reviews
Camera
59 reviews
59 reviews
59 reviews
59 reviews
Connectivity
59 reviews
59 reviews
59 reviews
Battery
- 2%Less than half day
- 7%Less than a day
- 19%One day
- 46%More than one day
- 27%Two days or more
59 reviews
Software
- 27%It comes with a clean operating system
- 64%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 8%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
59 reviews
- 30%Never
- 23%Once a year
- 34%Every six months
- 13%Every two months or less
59 reviews
User reviews
- Was working fine for about an year, later the security updates slowed it down really bad
Battery life was amazing but as the phone slowed down with security updates, the battery also died its inevitable death within an year
Pros- Battery
- Vibrant display
- Powerful Flash
- Aluminum chassis
Cons- Too slow
- No Android updates
- WiFi connection is weak
- RAM Management sucks
- Overheating without any reason
- Front Camera is bad
- 4.2
- Screen5.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity4.0
- Battery10
View answers - AutoThere are better devices today for the same price and even lower
Design. Large frames that take up a lot of screen. It has a fingerprint reader on the front in the center of the lower frame. Power (RAM + processor). It is a device that in its time of launch (2017) easily supplied the undemanding applications of its time such as Clash Royale, Trivia Crack, some shooters, online games ... But nowadays a little demanding games like those mentioned above, in the device, they work with lag, you have to play with graphics to a minimum and very few in between ... Then it is simply insufficient for a person who wants a powerful device or for gaming. Camera. The truth could not tell how bad it is because it is the only device that I have tested. Battery. One of the most notable aspects of the device is its 5000mAh battery, which lasts between a day and a day and a half, depending on the use.
Pros- Long duration battery
- Drop resistant
Cons- Insufficient RAM (2GB)
- Insufficient ROM (16GB)
- Non-existent software updates
View original review- 4.9
- Screen4.5
- Performance4.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 4 months ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.