you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto G5s reviews by real users Motorola Moto G5s
- 5.2"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 157 g73.5 mm150.0 mm9.5 mm
- SnapD. 430 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v10 110.618
- 3000 mAh
- 1 15.9 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.1 Nougat
User score
- 10
- 21
- 4
- 1
- 1
- Screen7.4
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.6
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery5.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Performance & Hardware
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Camera
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Connectivity
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Battery
- 22%Less than half day
- 31%Less than a day
- 39%One day
- 8%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
37 reviews
Software
- 35%It comes with a clean operating system
- 62%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 3%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
37 reviews
- 19%Never
- 23%Once a year
- 42%Every six months
- 16%Every two months or less
37 reviews
User reviews
- Good for every day use, but sucks in demanding games.
Camera is really good, as it captures really good photos in day as well as nighttime,
The battery is really good too, as it can go a whole day from a full charge. Charging is a average, not too slow but not fast enough also.
It gives decent use in every day use, like WhatsApp FaceBook Instagram etc
But in demanding games it will seldom crash.- 8
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - A good phone overall, but with bad signal receptionPros
- Alluminium build
- Full HD screen
- 15W Fast charging
- Average to good camera
- No lags and freezes in 3 years of use
- Clean Android build
Cons- Low quality selfie camera
- Camera bumb
- Low screen visibility in sunlight
- Poor network reception
- Poor signal strength
- Bad call quality
- 5.6
- Screen5.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity2.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - 7.5
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.0
View answers- AutoIn 2023 it is not recommended, but when it came out for €130 it was fine
When it came out they promised that it would reach android 9 and that android oreo would arrive in months, it arrived after more than a year of waiting and thus its life of updates practically ended. Regular camera but in the middle of the low range of 2017. Fair battery and short power by today's standards and a few years ago.
View original review- 6.1
- Screen7.2
- Performance5.0
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - Autovery good cell phone
A very good cell phone, great Full hd screen, the front and rear cameras leave a little to be desired and the battery after a while also starts to last almost nothing. Despite being an entry-level cell phone, it was excellent value for money because of everything it brings.
Pros- Screen
- Sound
- connectivity
- screen size
- design
- Price
Cons- Drums
- Camera
View original review- 9.5
- Screen8.5
- Performance8.3
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery0.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- AnTuTu Version 3 months ago
- AnTuTu 3 months ago
- New opinion 8 months ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.