you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto G9 Play reviews by real users Motorola Moto G9 Play
- 6.5"TFT LCD (IPS)HD+20:9
- 200 g75.7 mm165.2 mm9.2 mm
- SnapD. 662 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v8 174.500
- 5000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/1.7 S5KGM1 23SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 10 Q Android 10
User score
- 21
- 9
- 5
- 3
- 0
- Screen7.1
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery8.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Performance & Hardware
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Camera
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Connectivity
38 reviews
38 reviews
38 reviews
Battery
- 3%Less than half day
- 8%Less than a day
- 24%One day
- 46%More than one day
- 19%Two days or more
38 reviews
Software
- 16%It comes with a clean operating system
- 76%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 8%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
38 reviews
- 21%Never
- 9%Once a year
- 45%Every six months
- 24%Every two months or less
38 reviews
User reviews
- Not a bad phone but has some drawbacks
My previous phone was an original Google Pixek. The G9 Play is not bad at all, but I have been used to some features I do not have right now. The phone is over weight, the 5000mAh battery, also makes the phone feel fat and over sized. The other disappointment is the camera. The main shooter is a 48MP sensor, but as the sensor brand is not disclosed, I must say is neither the Sony nor the Samsung sensor. Even the 4year old Pixel takes better pictures and videos.
Pros- Battery size
- Screen resolution
- Processing power
- Clean Android
- Connectivity
- Good sound
Cons- All cameras
- Weight
- Size
- Prone to scratches
- 3.7
- Screen4.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera4.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - Feels premium, but doesn't cost as such
The phone feels like a flagship of years prior. All features of the flagships from a year or so ago are present.
Pros- build quality
- clean OS
- comfortable
- powerful
Cons- selfie camera gets blurry without light
- slow face recognition
- 9.4
- Screen9.2
- Performance8.5
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - AutoPleasant
Good for games and basic activities, for common users you won't have anything to complain about in excess of the 64GB memory, but for users like me who play more than 8 hours a day then it leaves something to be desired.
Pros- Battery
- Camera
- Loading
- GPU
- Ram
- Android still current
Cons- Chokes in heavy games
- Need Gcam
- Fragile screen
- Only 64GB
- Not updated
View original review- 7.5
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoWell depending on how much you buy it for.
It was a good cell phone given my case. I bought it on sale used for 25 dollars (current official dollar = 800 pesos) in June 2023 in Argentina, at that time it was a good purchase, now in January 2024 it is around 65 dollars on Facebook Marketplace, I don't know if I would buy it again , maybe if I found it very cheap, since due to the use that I give to the device (social networks, watching series and videos, light games and daily tasks) I would prefer to buy a cheaper one that performs well in those tasks.
Pros- camera
- fluidity daily use
- fluency in games
- battery
- system customization
- design
Cons- shine under the sun
- The system takes up more space than on other phones
View original review- 7.2
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood at the beginning, terrible at the end
It was very good at the beginning, fluid and everything. But after a few years the system itself did not run. And Motorola is terrible at updates. This cell phone should have received at least Android 11 or 12.
Pros- Battery
- Performance
- Price
Cons- Support
- Updates
- Durability
View original review- 6.1
- Screen5.7
- Performance5.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoDecent despite the weather.
I've had it for almost a year and it works well. The battery lasts and even more if you know how to deactivate functions or apps that use battery. The cameras are greatly improved with a stable gcam, because the stock camera usually has very gray colors even in HDR mode. The screen is ok in terms of brightness and if you don't mind HD+ you won't have any problems. In games I am not very demanding and I know that in heavy games it can get a little hot, but it is because I live in a hot area. Ultimately, and taking into account its release date, it is very useful for everyday use.
Pros- Battery
- Fluency
- Cameras (gcam)
Cons- slow charging
- Stock Photos
- stock video
View original review- 8
- Screen7.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 13 days ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Version 2 years ago
Score
- 4.7 Design & Materials
- 5.5 Performance & Hardware
- 6.2 Camera
- 6.5 Connectivity
- 7.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.