User score

Overall satisfaction
8.6
  • 25
  • 8
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
34 reviews
  • Screen8.2
  • Performance7.6
  • Camera7.8
  • Connectivity8.7
  • Battery7.2
Want to comment on the Motorola Moto X4?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
7.2

34 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
9.0

34 reviews

Is it comfortable?
8.9

34 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
7.7

34 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
7.3

34 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
8.3

34 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
7.2

34 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
8.6

34 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
6.5

34 reviews

Quality of selfies
7.5

34 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
8.7

34 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
9.0

34 reviews

Quality of the GPS
8.9

34 reviews

And the WiFi?
8.2

34 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 3%
    Less than half day
  • 15%
    Less than a day
  • 47%
    One day
  • 35%
    More than one day
  • 0%
    Two days or more

34 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 21%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 76%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 3%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

34 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 6%
    Never
  • 3%
    Once a year
  • 53%
    Every six months
  • 38%
    Every two months or less

34 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Good build, great batery and quick charging

    Pros
    • Build quality
    • Fast charging
    • Cheap
    Cons
    • Has slowed down over time
    • There is better alternatives now
    • 10
    • Screen6.5
    • Performance7.3
    • Camera6.5
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • very nice phone. 89559 Antutu score.

    • 9
    • Screen7.0
    • Performance7.0
    • Camera7.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Good team at the time, today it falls very short

    I had it for 3 years, it has a good quality IPS FHD panel, I liked the pure android, premium construction materials (aluminum and glass), good hand feel and drop resistant. Good cameras at the time, and with the gcam the photos improve a lot, especially the night ones. Very fair processor performance, battery falls short (3000 mah) approx 5 hr of screen, very limited storage (32gb) that mostly came out with that version, in the last 2 years of use the battery has worn me out a lot giving just 3 hours of screen time and it no longer supported fast charging, until it was completely damaged, probably from playing CODM a lot... I would only recommend buying it when it is at a good price and for basic use of social networks

    Pros
    • Construction materials
    • IP68 water resistance
    • drop resistance
    • Size
    Cons
    • Battery
    • Storage
    • 7.5
    • Screen9.7
    • Performance5.6
    • Camera7.2
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Excellent device

    I got it used 50 euros for a second mobile... Runs fast, doesn't crash... battery one day... camera I downloaded gcam and it works great for night shots and selfies, It's a very successful model... even today it stands worthy of today's 200 euro models. No problem, it has worked perfectly

    • 9.6
    • Screen10
    • Performance10
    • Camera8.5
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Good experience

    An excellent phone with a very good processor with a very good performance

    Pros
    • front flash
    • Camera
    • Performance
    Cons
    • Audio
    • Android 9
    • 9
    • Screen9.0
    • Performance8.6
    • Camera8.5
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    It was good in its time

    In its time it was a good upper mid-range phone, sufficient performance for everyday use, although it had very low volume since it only has a single speaker for the earpiece and speaker.

    Pros
    • Camera
    Cons
    • Audio
    • 8.4
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance5.3
    • Camera8.5
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Good, but the phone is very fragile

    • 5.5
    • Screen4.7
    • Performance4.3
    • Camera3.2
    • Connectivity7.6
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    It had a good processor but the lack of RAM made it impossible to use the device intensively

    It was a very good phone, I had the black version that was not as beautiful as the lighter one but it was beautiful nonetheless. It was not a cheap cell phone at the time I bought it but it served me well to a certain extent. In terms of performance, for light daily use it was good, it had fast execution of the most casual apps, like Facebook and Youtube, and it didn't crash as long as you closed all open apps in the background so as not to fill the memory that filled very easily, it ran several heavier titles like Mortal Kombat X; Asphalt Extreme; Horizon; among others without crash, but for current games like most battleroyale like PUBG it would not run due to the lack of RAM, the game would end without a doubt, even because I tried to play GTA SAN ANDREAS on it and the game just didn't work, leave alone after a few minutes of playing. Regarding multimedia, it had an exceptional sound in both quality and volume.

    Pros
    • Sound
    • IPS display with more vivid colors than many Amoleds
    • Frontal camera
    • Design and finish
    • Primary speaker location
    • frequent system updates
    Cons
    • RAM and ROM
    • IP68 drowned out audio when wet
    • Battery life that didn't last a day
    • 7
    • Screen8.0
    • Performance6.6
    • Camera8.0
    • Connectivity7.3
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    It's good, but always had its cons

    Storage is horrible, you can't download more than 2 heavy games if you want social networking apps too, because half of them are system-wide and over time the space consumed increases. The front camera in the first batches, mine in this case, doesn’t focus on the person, and that’s horrible. I never took a good selfie. It's very fluid for apps, but games like Asphalt 9 and that require a lot are not good. But it is more fluid than many recent ones. And the sound is horrible, and over time it only gets worse. (Mom, I'm in print)

    Pros
    • Back camera
    • Fluidity for apps
    • Gorgeous design
    • Withstands falls and risks
    • Compatible with GSI custom roms
    Cons
    • Front camera of the first batches
    • Storage
    • Extremely low sound
    • Hybrid drawer
    • 7.6
    • Screen9.7
    • Performance4.0
    • Camera5.0
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    I have been with this equipment for more than a year, I use it daily with intensive use and I am doing quite well

    • 8.5
    • Screen10
    • Performance8.3
    • Camera9.5
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery7.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
April 26, 2023
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 1 year ago
6.4
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 5.7 Design & Materials
  • 4.9 Performance & Hardware
  • 5.4 Camera
  • 6.6 Connectivity
  • 4.7 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.