you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto X4 reviews by real users Motorola Moto X4
- 5.2"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 163 g73.4 mm148.4 mm8.0 mm
- SnapD. 630 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v8 103.403
- 3000 mAh
- 1 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 2SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 9.0 P Android 9.0 Pie
User score
- 25
- 8
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.7
- Battery7.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Performance & Hardware
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Camera
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Connectivity
34 reviews
34 reviews
34 reviews
Battery
- 3%Less than half day
- 15%Less than a day
- 47%One day
- 35%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
34 reviews
Software
- 21%It comes with a clean operating system
- 76%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 3%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
34 reviews
- 6%Never
- 3%Once a year
- 53%Every six months
- 38%Every two months or less
34 reviews
User reviews
- AutoGood team at the time, today it falls very short
I had it for 3 years, it has a good quality IPS FHD panel, I liked the pure android, premium construction materials (aluminum and glass), good hand feel and drop resistant. Good cameras at the time, and with the gcam the photos improve a lot, especially the night ones. Very fair processor performance, battery falls short (3000 mah) approx 5 hr of screen, very limited storage (32gb) that mostly came out with that version, in the last 2 years of use the battery has worn me out a lot giving just 3 hours of screen time and it no longer supported fast charging, until it was completely damaged, probably from playing CODM a lot... I would only recommend buying it when it is at a good price and for basic use of social networks
Pros- Construction materials
- IP68 water resistance
- drop resistance
- Size
Cons- Battery
- Storage
View original review- 7.5
- Screen9.7
- Performance5.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoExcellent device
I got it used 50 euros for a second mobile... Runs fast, doesn't crash... battery one day... camera I downloaded gcam and it works great for night shots and selfies, It's a very successful model... even today it stands worthy of today's 200 euro models. No problem, it has worked perfectly
View original review- 9.6
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - 8.4
- Screen7.2
- Performance5.3
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoIt had a good processor but the lack of RAM made it impossible to use the device intensively
It was a very good phone, I had the black version that was not as beautiful as the lighter one but it was beautiful nonetheless. It was not a cheap cell phone at the time I bought it but it served me well to a certain extent. In terms of performance, for light daily use it was good, it had fast execution of the most casual apps, like Facebook and Youtube, and it didn't crash as long as you closed all open apps in the background so as not to fill the memory that filled very easily, it ran several heavier titles like Mortal Kombat X; Asphalt Extreme; Horizon; among others without crash, but for current games like most battleroyale like PUBG it would not run due to the lack of RAM, the game would end without a doubt, even because I tried to play GTA SAN ANDREAS on it and the game just didn't work, leave alone after a few minutes of playing. Regarding multimedia, it had an exceptional sound in both quality and volume.
Pros- Sound
- IPS display with more vivid colors than many Amoleds
- Frontal camera
- Design and finish
- Primary speaker location
- frequent system updates
Cons- RAM and ROM
- IP68 drowned out audio when wet
- Battery life that didn't last a day
View original review- 7
- Screen8.0
- Performance6.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt's good, but always had its cons
Storage is horrible, you can't download more than 2 heavy games if you want social networking apps too, because half of them are system-wide and over time the space consumed increases. The front camera in the first batches, mine in this case, doesn’t focus on the person, and that’s horrible. I never took a good selfie. It's very fluid for apps, but games like Asphalt 9 and that require a lot are not good. But it is more fluid than many recent ones. And the sound is horrible, and over time it only gets worse. (Mom, I'm in print)
Pros- Back camera
- Fluidity for apps
- Gorgeous design
- Withstands falls and risks
- Compatible with GSI custom roms
Cons- Front camera of the first batches
- Storage
- Extremely low sound
- Hybrid drawer
View original review- 7.6
- Screen9.7
- Performance4.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery0.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 11 months ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.