you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Nokia 3.1
- 5.2"LCD IPSHD+18:9
- 138 g68.7 mm146.3 mm8.7 mm
- MT6750 Octa-Core 2 GB RAM 32 GB
- v? 40.400
- 2990 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 10 Q Android 10
User score
- 4
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 0
- Screen7.9
- Performance7.5
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery6.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Performance & Hardware
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Camera
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Connectivity
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Battery
- 14%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 57%One day
- 29%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
7 reviews
Software
- 83%It comes with a clean operating system
- 0%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 17%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
7 reviews
- 0%Never
- 17%Once a year
- 0%Every six months
- 83%Every two months or less
7 reviews
User reviews
- AutoExcellent and elegant mobile a good daily companion
I have it for more than a year, it is a great phone, the battery continues to last with continuous use during the day about 8 to 9 hours, beautiful design, with diamond cut aluminum and 2.5D edges, I have no complaints within cell phones input, personally it has surprised me I usually play n64 and ps1 emulators and zero lagg, great rear camera in colors and its slow motion
Pros- Quality, made to resist like the nokias of yesteryear
Cons- Only 2gb of ram for games heavier than asphalt8
View original review- 9.8
- Screen10
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoVery limited
In design it looks good, but inside are the problems, the processor is bad, when you play the phone it gets stuck, it makes the experience bad, that if the GPU is decent enough, it is capable of executing demanding games well. The sound is pretty loud, the camera is bad when it comes to night shots and zoom. It brings several errors and defects at the software level. And storage is very limited, almost nothing can be done.
Pros- screen
- Sound
- Constant updates
Cons- Processor
- WiFi connection
- software
- Security
- Storage
- RAM
View original review- 6.4
- Screen6.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9.5
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoGenerally good for what it costs
It is a cell phone with good design, takes beautiful day photos, runs the pug in low quality, it lasts the battery all day if you do not use it too much and in general it works well I recommend it. It cost me 3200 Mexican pesos
Pros- Camera
- Screen resolution
- Design
- Connectivity
Cons- Battery
- performance
View original review- 8.7
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera8.3
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 year ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.