Nokia 5.1 reviews by real users Nokia 5.1
- 5.5"LCD IPSFHD+18:9
- 160 g70.7 mm151.1 mm8.3 mm
- Helio P18 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v? 62.000
- 3000 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · Unknow SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo
User score
Design & Materials
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Performance & Hardware
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Camera
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Connectivity
10 reviews
10 reviews
10 reviews
Battery
- 10%Less than half day
- 20%Less than a day
- 70%One day
- 0%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
10 reviews
Software
- 70%It comes with a clean operating system
- 30%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
10 reviews
- 0%Never
- 10%Once a year
- 20%Every six months
- 70%Every two months or less
10 reviews
User reviews
- AutoBad, very bad
The phone gets too hot with any application you are using, even with the simplest game it does, the camera is mediocre, I do not consider it bad, but much less good, the cell phone has a lot of frame, the useful surface is not used more when the cell phone is very small and the design without counting the horrible frames is very good it is an elegant cell phone that seems to have good construction materials.
Pros- Design
- Materials with which it is made
Cons- Everything else
View original review- 1
- Screen8.2
- Performance0.6
- Camera1.0
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery0.0
View answers - Automy experience has been excellent, the capacity of applications, photos is very high.
The design is very nice, the camera is excellent, the battery lasts if it is at low brightness, if you increase it, the battery goes down very quickly, one thing I don't like is that the battery connector does not pull very well the first months It is excellent, when time passes the loading module does not grip very well and it has to be put in many positions to pull and load. A few weeks ago, the charge for the cell phone to reach 100% is 4-5 hours.
View original review- 9.1
- Screen8.5
- Performance7.6
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoGood
As for the design, to be a low-end mobile the materials feel premium, the 16-megapixel camera performs well and the HDR mode helps a lot, but it is poor at night, being made mostly of aluminum, it is too resistant, once I fell down rolling down the stairs and several times I fell on the stones and barely had any scratches that were not even noticeable. As for games, they were fluid, and they never froze, the problem is that being MediaTek the phone tends to overheat when power is required, but for everyday use it is perfect because being totally pure Android it is very fluid
Pros- Shock resistance
- Connectivity
- Fluency
- Updates
Cons- Battery
- Camera
- Power
- Camera
View original review- 9.4
- Screen8.7
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt's good
The device looks very beautiful to look at, the applications are going well and the best thing is that, having Android one, it makes the user experience the best it does not have blotware or applications from the mobile operator that usually annoy a lot or that We will never use it and not only that it will also have monthly updates both security and operating system, only it has to heat up due to its MediaTek Helio P18 processor and its aluminum body, its battery lasts for the day if not I demand too much of him, otherwise he is fine.
Pros- Its design feels premium and pretty
- Your camera
- Software is its strong point
Cons- Having introduced the Snapdragon 600 series
- Battery
View original review- 7.6
- Screen8.7
- Performance6.6
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoWell the cell phone was Masó less but for the price there are many better
In design it was very beautiful but it got very hot Performance was bad for its price The battery was good I got up to date and that I am a demanding user I would recommend it only for people who use WhatsApp and facebook Why for other apps it was bad
Pros- Design
- Battery
- screen
- What is made of aluminum
Cons- The 2012 processor (helio p18)
- Frontal camera
- Connectivity (both Wi-Fi and network)
View original review- 5.1
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.3
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - 6.1
- Screen6.7
- Performance8.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoGood
HMD again bets for an elegant design, nothing daring but without doubt imposing its style. The highlight of the Nokia 5.1, more power thanks to the MTK Helio P18. In the section of the screen there is undoubtedly a great improvement thanks to the new IPS LCD panel, with higher resolution and a good use of 439ppi. The camera, by day shows a quality more than remarkable, unfortunately it does not happen the same when the sun is hidden, I do not know if it is programming failure but even having a very powerful flash the image comes out too dark and the light barely manages to be noticed on the objects focused . The battery is due, with 2970mA barely and it reaches to work 1 day. The software, undoubtedly returns to comply, is perceived much more fluid, it shows the lack of more RAM but in general it has a good performance.
Pros- Screen (improved a lot)
- Design
- Software (Updated)
- Acceptable performance
- Quality of materials
Cons- Battery
- Microprocessor (One Snapdragon 600)
- RAM
- Internal memory
View original review- 9.3
- Screen9.8
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9.4
- Screen9.8
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.3
- Connectivity9.7
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.