you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 6.39"LCD IPSHD+19.5:9
- 181 g 76.0 mm 161.0 mm 8.7 mm
- SnapD. 662 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- v9 196.099
- 4000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 234SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake Android One (Android 11)
User score
- 5
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.3
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery8.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Performance & Hardware
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Camera
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Connectivity
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 14%Less than a day
- 14%One day
- 57%More than one day
- 14%Two days or more
7 reviews
Software
- 86%It comes with a clean operating system
- 14%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
7 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 14%Every six months
- 86%Every two months or less
7 reviews
User reviews
User Reviews
- Most Underrated Budget Phone
Majority of people likes the practice of Cheap Phone with high specification on paper Smartphones. Yet somehow, every single Nokia device deemed to be way overpriced. From my personal Opinion with almost 4-months usage of Nokia 5.4, the device price per performance is very well balanced.
This can be seen by their Antutu Benchmark, with the same CPU, the performance offered by Nokia is way better scored and better performed than many cheap phones with the same CPU model.
The camera also performed pretty well, especially if you install GCam.
The battery might seem small, since it's only 4000 mAh in paper. But, the power consumption can reach almost 24 hours straight if you use it normally without intense gaming. Imagine if it's packed with 5000 mAh.
The main cons is that this phone still use HD+ Screen. Could use FHD+Pros- Pure Stock Android
- No Bloatware
- Performance is consistent
- Price per Performance is great
- Pretty durable
Cons- No Fast Charging
- Battery Could be bigger
- It's still use HD+ screen
- 10
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoI like.
For a state employee for such a price, the phone works well, I have been using it for more than a year and a half in conditions of heat, dust, frost -20. So far it works well. There is a problem with the battery, the charge lasts for a day, or even less, the fingerprint is not conveniently located and works every other time .I turned it off.
Cons- Battery, fingerprint scanner.
View original review- 8.6
- Screen8.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - 10
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers- 8
- Screen6.2
- Performance5.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoOkay
The phone is reliable from day to day, the photos at night are not so good but using the night mode it manages to take a good photo without being excellent. In terms of performance, it complies, and the battery that does not deceive lasts the day and a little more, the battery is very good. In games it falls short with demanding titles but in the rest of the social and daily use apps it is excellent, the screen is not the best but it complies with good brightness. I recommend the phone.
View original review- 6.5
- Screen5.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 6 months ago
Score
- 5.2 Design & Materials
- 5.8 Performance & Hardware
- 5.7 Camera
- 6.1 Connectivity
- 5.4 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.