Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 31%Less than half day
- 25%Less than a day
- 38%One day
- 6%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
- 7%It comes with a clean operating system
- 93%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 15%Once a year
- 46%Every six months
- 8%Every two months or less
- Don't buy it....
The touch screen doesn't work aftee a few weeks, it frose multiple times(Had to hold down power button for 15 secs), The headpgone jack doesn't work with most headphones.Positives
- Good looks
- Headphone jack doesn't work
- Touch screen broke
- Good smartphone overall but no assistance from Oukitel or this model
I bought this phone more or less 2 months ago and for the money I spent i supposed it was a good value.
I really like design and also quality of assembling is really good
As expected camera is weak but no compliant for the price range.
Disappointed a little for the battery, it not enough for a day with moderate usage
I'm COMPLETELY DISAPPOINTED by Oukitel instead for the support this company provides because I got a touch screen broken after a fall and so far I'm not able to find replacements for this specific model.
No support on Facebook and Oukitel website is a lost of time. No answer either via mail. I tried also to call phone numbers but also in this case no answer. Next time I buy a smartphone I must take in account much more quality of customer services and Oukitel despite quality of products does not provide any support at all.
Sorry to say that I'm not going to buy any other Oukitel device
- AutoAt first it is great but it does not take long to break
Great the first impression. After 4 months the screen stops working. Dump stuff and order to fix (€ 7 shipping). They send me a new one, this hard 3 months (€ 7 shipping) They send me another that is fixed. It lasts two months. I wish to send itPositives
- Apparently it is very good and cheap
- That does not break
- AutoVery good price / performance ratio
Paris, September 27, 2017 Purchased since June 01, 2017, no particular problems put by the earphone jack positioned poorly in depth (I had cut 1 mm insulation from the plug of my headphones) and autonomy battery life (6 hours autonomy) Good reception in GPS and 4G telephony at FREE. I had an update since my purchase using the UPDATE App. Being careful, I removed the protective film from the screen and, as a result, I gained sensitivity to the touch of the screen. The photos, in daytime are acceptable. January 2018, In addition to my opinion of September 2017 Loss of sensitivity of part of the screen. Can no longer use the scheme for protection. Required to return to a code with numbers. February 2018: The battery is no longer charged, therefore, unusable smartphone. From the good impression at the beginning, following the various problems to meet, I advise the purchase ofPositives
- Screen visible in the sun
- The 64G rom
- Dual SIM
- Daytime photos
- The loss of sensitivity of part of the screen after 6 months of use
- The battery is charged more after 7 months
- AutoMark to avoid, zero, zero
After 15 days of normal operation, the screen began to beep severely. I sent it back to make it change, they did not even change it. So warranty 0, while I paid for it, and customer service 0000000000Positives
- Nothing good
- all to improve, or rather stop making foam phones
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 3.6 Design & Materials
- 4.1 Performance & Hardware
- 5.9 Camera
- 3.5 Connectivity
- 3.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.