- 5.5"FHD70% useful16:9
- 195 g 77.5 mm 154.0 mm 8.5 mm
- MT6737 Quad-Core 2 GB RAM 16 GB
- v6 40.134
- 3200 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · Unknow IMX135 Exmor RS 2SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 4%Less than half day
- 32%Less than a day
- 28%One day
- 24%More than one day
- 12%Two days or more
- 24%It comes with a clean operating system
- 64%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 12%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 16%Once a year
- 44%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
- Not bad
The phone is not bad for the money that is being given for him, it seems to me that now there are a lot better for those couples. The only problem is that they do not get all the signals from the network.
You have better for this money!
- It's worth it
I find this smartphone an affordable item when it comes to comparing its performance with the amount of money you pay for getting it. Of course, you can't expect a thrilling performance, but its performance is quite good when you performs daily basis activities with the phone, such as surfing the net, looking on social networks, messaging, and even when playing average games. Regarding the camera, I have realised that the pictures have a bit of noise even when capturing pictures at daylight, but they are quite good, they turn into worse when night comes, you get pictures with a good exposure level but you also get a lot of noise in them. Dual camera is a trick you can use as long as there be enough light, and you can take some interesting photos.Pros
- Very sharp screen
- Value for money
- Good looking phone
- Battery life lasts one day
- Camera at night
- I expect to have a larger battery life.
- oukitel u20 plus
i got it 6-2-2017 , for that money i think is very very good mobile phone , until now , no problem . i hope oukitel will be trustworthy company . 4G is fantastic , day camera very very good , night camera bad . sound not bad but also not good . For that money is perfect .Pros
- full hd
- with silicone case
- day camera
- 5.5 inch
- everythink works perfect "until now"
- night camera
- AutoDo not Buy It!
I promised a lot at the beginning, before I bought it. After that, the mobile phone is not bad at all, because it has an FHD screen and a good construction coupled with a reasonable battery. Then when talking about fluidity and selfie camera, they leave to be desired. For these values, I would advise you to start a line xiaomi like Redmi 4x or redmi 5Pros
- Ecra FHD
- Mediatek (weak)
- 2gb Ram
- AutoBest cell phone I've ever had
Very beautiful cell phone. Wonderful for the cost benefit. I could not find any that match him in price and quality. Pictures very good, fast, never caught with me. Stuff left to be desired, but the wifi is good. Good memorial. Update never arrived, but made no difference.Pros
- AutoA very bad processor, the rest acceptable
The battery does not last a whole day, I am always charging it with an external battery, the cameras have very good quality days, however at night it leaves a lot to be desired, the effect of slow and bad focus but good quality screen and excellent soundPros
- Day camera
- Exterior brightness
- Night camera
- AutoNot quite
The phone itself is very, very good, but ... It came to me initially with a defect, then there were even more defects, even though the phone was used neatly. The quality of the camera, of course, is not the same as described by the seller - the photos are bearable, but nothing more. And (!) Only in bright light. If the light is not enough, the quality drops sharply. The battery in the frost begins to lose its charge in seconds - and this is not an epithet, 1% in the standby mode flies for ~ 5-10 seconds. On the upper corners of the screen there were "icicles" from broken pixels. The SIM card slot is not about
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 2.0 Design & Materials
- 3.8 Performance & Hardware
- 4.2 Camera
- 3.7 Connectivity
- 4.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.