you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Samsung Galaxy A20
- 6.4"Super AMOLEDHD+19.5:9
- 169 g74.7 mm158.4 mm7.8 mm
- Exynos 7884 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v7 88.710
- 4000 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/1.9 2SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 9.0 P Android 9.0 Pie
User score
- 60
- 33
- 10
- 6
- 2
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.2
- Camera7.1
- Connectivity8.4
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
111 reviews
111 reviews
111 reviews
111 reviews
Performance & Hardware
111 reviews
111 reviews
111 reviews
Camera
111 reviews
111 reviews
111 reviews
111 reviews
Connectivity
111 reviews
111 reviews
111 reviews
Battery
- 1%Less than half day
- 13%Less than a day
- 39%One day
- 45%More than one day
- 3%Two days or more
111 reviews
Software
- 6%It comes with a clean operating system
- 76%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 18%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
111 reviews
- 2%Never
- 12%Once a year
- 48%Every six months
- 38%Every two months or less
111 reviews
User reviews
- Long-lasting but not the best
I got this phone on discount, and its lasted me about 4 years. It cannot install many games because it has a pissy amount of storage and unfortunately you can't actually move apps to the SD card even though it says you can. Still, it serves as a good phone if you just wanna text and call and maybe use twitter or other non intensive apps.
Pros- Headphone Jack
- SD port
- Decent battery life for a while
- NFC function
- Split screen (laggy but works)
Cons- Bad Performance
- Eventually will have battery issues
- Fingerprint scanner is not the best
- Camera quality best suited for blurry aesthetics
- Updates cause device to lag on reboot
- 6.4
- Screen5.5
- Performance3.6
- Camera4.0
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - For $ 150 it could be better
I like the design, it's simple and doesn't have many twists and turns so it's good.
The screen is good, it looks good and has good viewing angles, the colors are quite remarkable and sharp.
In power it is not very good, it can run basic games and medium graphics at 30 fps, so it is not a very good option to play.
The camera is good, daytime photography has good detail and captures colors well, maybe you need to have a good pulse but that's fine.
Night photography is a bad thing, the shadows penetrate the colors and the lights too, as well as the noise increases enormously, the selfie is good and the video too.
The battery lasts all day, with that processor it compensates for the quality screen so the battery is good.
In conclusion: it is not a bad option but there are better ones.Pros- Design
- Daytime Photo
- Screen
- Battery
Cons- Processor
- HD+ Res
- Price
- 8.2
- Screen7.5
- Performance6.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Básico pero no sobresale mucho
Tuve este teléfono y en rendimiento nada que decir pero hay detalles como por ejemplo si instalas un juego que en cuanto a rendimiento requiere más potencia el teléfono se pega y a veses tiene lag
Pros- Bateria
- Conectividad
- Hardware
- Diseño
Cons- Espacio
- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Version, Name, Aliases, RAM 6 months ago
- Version 6 months ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Market 2 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 6.1 Design & Materials
- 4.8 Performance & Hardware
- 4.9 Camera
- 6.7 Connectivity
- 5.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.