you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)
- 4.7"Super AMOLEDHD16:9
- 132 g65.2 mm134.5 mm7.3 mm
- Exynos 7578 Quad-Core 1.5 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 34.000
- 2300 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/1.9 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1.1 Lollipop
User score
- 11
- 10
- 3
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.1
- Performance7.2
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
24 reviews
24 reviews
24 reviews
24 reviews
Performance & Hardware
24 reviews
24 reviews
24 reviews
Camera
24 reviews
24 reviews
24 reviews
24 reviews
Connectivity
24 reviews
24 reviews
24 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 22%Less than a day
- 43%One day
- 30%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
24 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 70%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 30%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
24 reviews
- 0%Never
- 29%Once a year
- 57%Every six months
- 14%Every two months or less
24 reviews
User reviews
- Beautiful, compact device with excellent camera and battery life.Pros
- Stunning looks
- Fantastic, vibrant screen
- Excellent camera
- Great battery life
Cons- Glass back prone to scratches/fingerprints
- Performance is a little sluggish
- Preinstalled bloatware
- 8.5
- Screen8.8
- Performance7.7
- Camera8.3
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood cell phone
Due to its size, the cell phone fits very well in the hand and workmanship is very good. The 16 GB memory is sufficient, as is the performance with the 1.5 GB RAM. The resolution of the display is good, HD is enough for a 4.7 inch cell phone and has a very good Amoled display. The connection is good and the mobile data is running fast enough. The weak point is the battery that quickly ran flat when used continuously. The camera is good and the resolution of 13 MP is enough for very good pictures. It is a good and smaller mid-range phone
Pros- Display
- Manageability
- camera
- connection
Cons- battery pack
View original review- 7.4
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - 7.6
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.3
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers- eidan-vidal-colque-colque-5d190fb9898ccSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F4 years ago
- 7.6
- Screen8.0
- Performance6.6
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
- 5.7 Design & Materials
- 4.6 Performance & Hardware
- 4.7 Camera
- 5.3 Connectivity
- 4.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.