Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 4.7"HD69% useful16:9
- 132 g 65.2 mm 134.5 mm 7.3 mm
- Exynos 7578 Quad-Core 1.5 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 34.000
- 2300 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/1.9 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1.1 Lollipop
User score
- 11
- 10
- 2
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.1
- Performance7.2
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
23 opinions
23 opinions
23 opinions
23 opinions
Performance & Hardware
23 opinions
23 opinions
23 opinions
Camera
23 opinions
23 opinions
23 opinions
23 opinions
Connectivity
23 opinions
23 opinions
23 opinions
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 22%Less than a day
- 43%One day
- 30%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
23 opinions
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 70%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 30%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
23 opinions
- 0%Never
- 29%Once a year
- 57%Every six months
- 14%Every two months or less
23 opinions
User reviews
User Reviews
- Chouaib_LalouiSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- AngyalkenceSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- btfletcherSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?ContinueBeautiful, compact device with excellent camera and battery life.Pros
- Stunning looks
- Fantastic, vibrant screen
- Excellent camera
- Great battery life
Cons- Glass back prone to scratches/fingerprints
- Performance is a little sluggish
- Preinstalled bloatware
- 8.5
- Screen8.8
- Performance7.7
- Camera8.3
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - QuezSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F3 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- racing3010amgSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F11 months agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?ContinueAutoGood cell phone
Due to its size, the cell phone fits very well in the hand and workmanship is very good. The 16 GB memory is sufficient, as is the performance with the 1.5 GB RAM. The resolution of the display is good, HD is enough for a 4.7 inch cell phone and has a very good Amoled display. The connection is good and the mobile data is running fast enough. The weak point is the battery that quickly ran flat when used continuously. The camera is good and the resolution of 13 MP is enough for very good pictures. It is a good and smaller mid-range phone
Pros- Display
- Manageability
- camera
- connection
Cons- battery pack
View original opinion- 7.4
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - RODRIGOYS.012Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F1 year agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- 7.6
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.3
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - MrAndroidArgSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)1.5GB · 16GB · A310 DUAL1 year agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- eidan-vidal-colque-colque-5d190fb9898ccSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F1 year agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- 7.6
- Screen8.0
- Performance6.6
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - armaz4Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
- szgrucaSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Global · 1.5GB · 16GB · A310F2 years agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?Continue
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
Score
no Ki
- 5.4 Design & Materials
- 3.3 Performance & Hardware
- 3.9 Camera
- 5.4 Connectivity
- 2.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.