you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
- 4.5"Super AMOLEDLowRes5:3
- 131 g69.3 mm132.6 mm8.9 mm
- Exynos 3475 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM 8 GB
- v6 22.095
- 2050 mAh
- 1 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 SELF 2 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1.1 Lollipop
User score
- 5
- 9
- 10
- 6
- 7
- Screen6.8
- Performance4.7
- Camera5.4
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Performance & Hardware
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Camera
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Connectivity
37 reviews
37 reviews
37 reviews
Battery
- 14%Less than half day
- 46%Less than a day
- 30%One day
- 11%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
37 reviews
Software
- 11%It comes with a clean operating system
- 43%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 46%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
37 reviews
- 65%Never
- 12%Once a year
- 9%Every six months
- 15%Every two months or less
37 reviews
User reviews
- Nice for low budget
Good phone design but low quality Performance have comfortable in hand phone
Pros- Like the design
- Comfort
- Cheap
- Good Camera for that price
- Nice 4G for cheap phone
Cons- Low performance
- Front camera
- Battery
- Scratch
- 4.4
- Screen8.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - Very simple anderson linited Phone.
Low performance, basic Hardware, inutil apps imposible to uninstal, With problems ofrece ROM space.
Pros- Screem bright
- Strongh
Cons- ROM Memory
- Original Apps
- Low Speed
- Poor hardware
- Short screem
- 0.7
- Screen3.0
- Performance1.0
- Camera0.6
- Connectivity4.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoA low range today that is used for very elementary use
I had it for a very short time but still in 2022 I could use social networks and games like Asphalt Nitro, but nothing else. The navigation in the system was slow, and the applications have already stopped receiving updates due to incompatibility, and if I could receive them, surely there would be no space, although, as it was a gift, it was much more than enough for me
Pros- AMOLED screen
- Good Wi-Fi reception
- Design
Cons- Screen Resolution
- Performance of a $50 phone
- Battery duration
- outdated software
- Storage space
- cameras
View original review- 5.3
- Screen4.7
- Performance5.3
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt had potential at the time
It was very durable and worked well for the most common activities, but after a year of use it started to get difficult to give it, always crashing screen scrolling, browsing in apps and in simple games. in my opinion it has a good screen but poor performance.
View original review- 7.5
- Screen8.2
- Performance2.6
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 3 months ago
Score
- 4.9 Design & Materials
- 4.5 Performance & Hardware
- 4.6 Camera
- 4.8 Connectivity
- 4.5 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.