you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Samsung Galaxy J6+ reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy J6+
- 6"LCD IPSHD+18:9
- 178 g76.9 mm161.4 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 425 Quad-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v? 32.000
- 3300 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/1.9 2SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 10 Q Android 10
User score
- 10
- 15
- 17
- 12
- 10
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.2
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity6.7
- Battery5.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
64 reviews
64 reviews
64 reviews
64 reviews
Performance & Hardware
64 reviews
64 reviews
64 reviews
Camera
64 reviews
64 reviews
64 reviews
64 reviews
Connectivity
64 reviews
64 reviews
64 reviews
Battery
- 17%Less than half day
- 33%Less than a day
- 32%One day
- 13%More than one day
- 5%Two days or more
64 reviews
Software
- 8%It comes with a clean operating system
- 73%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 19%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
64 reviews
- 21%Never
- 22%Once a year
- 43%Every six months
- 14%Every two months or less
64 reviews
User reviews
- AutoIt gets everything right except being a good smartphone.
I've had my first cell phone since 2020 and even when I purchased it it was already an extremely weak cell phone that suffered for simple games. Over time, it started to crash in basic applications like Whatsapp, YouTube and even when typing (yes, it crashes just by typing on the keyboard). Honestly, if it came with the Exynos 7870 it would perhaps do much better in basic tasks and heavier games, as it is noticeable how limited the processor leaves it. In conclusion, the cell phone has acceptable cameras; simple yet elegant design; fingerprint and face reader (even if a little flawed); acceptable sound; NFC. For 2024 it is definitely NOT worth it.
Pros- Cameras.
- Design.
- Digital reader.
- NFC.
Cons- Processor.
- Screen.
- Battery.
View original review- 5.9
- Screen7.0
- Performance3.3
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - 7.3
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 5 days ago
Score
- 4.9 Design & Materials
- 4.7 Performance & Hardware
- 4.9 Camera
- 5.7 Connectivity
- 4.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.