Opinions from the Samsung Galaxy S20

Nothing to envy the s21 and s22, which have even lowered some features. The s20 has 2k+ resolution, while the s21 and s22 have fullHD+ resolution. This one has a microSD card slot up to 1TB capacity, the other 2 lost it. This one has 12gb of ddr5 ram, the other 8gb of ram On battery they more or less tie the 3, they are not mobile to use them as if they were a nintendo, if you play at 120Hz you eat the battery fast. It must be taken into account that small mobiles have less battery than a large phone, due to space. To make battery consumption more profitable with respect to the screen, what I do is leave it at 60hz and fullhd+ in normal use, to move through menus, write watshap, etc. 60hz and 2k+ when I start to watch series or movies, since the cinema is recorded around 24hz, you don't need 120hz, and you take advantage of a higher resolution to improve the image and the screen saves on consumption When I play a game, I put the 120Hz (knowing that in about 3 hours of play you eat the battery) but only to games compatible with 120hz. All this is easily programmable with Samsung routines, so that it is done automatically, and you will perfectly reach the day and peak of use (with normal use, I tell you, it is not a Nintendo) In the rest, very good photos , all kinds of connectivity (wifi, 5g, nfc, etc.) In summary, a mobile cucumber, and whoever wants to have a compact mobile, it is not time to renew it, because the s21 s22 do not improve substantially, they even lose characteristics with respect to East.Who plans to buy it, value the money that the s20 costs compared to the s22 or the s23 that is about to come out, except for the processor (which I don't need to be the best, because the s20 flies) it loses the 2k screen and the precious microsd slot. That if, being an older mobile, they will leave it before updating, today it has android 13 (latest version)