you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Samsung Galaxy S3 mini
- 4"Super AMOLEDLowRes5:3
- 111 g63.0 mm121.6 mm10.0 mm
- U8500 Dual-Core 1 GB RAM 16 GB
- v? 9.711
- 1500 mAh
- 1 5 Mpx · Unknow SELF 0.3 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Bands
- Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean
User score
- 18
- 34
- 21
- 15
- 18
- Screen6.5
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.6
- Connectivity6.9
- Battery4.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
106 reviews
106 reviews
106 reviews
106 reviews
Performance & Hardware
106 reviews
106 reviews
106 reviews
Camera
106 reviews
106 reviews
106 reviews
106 reviews
Connectivity
106 reviews
106 reviews
106 reviews
Battery
- 21%Less than half day
- 43%Less than a day
- 28%One day
- 8%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
106 reviews
Software
- 6%It comes with a clean operating system
- 43%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 51%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
106 reviews
- 60%Never
- 24%Once a year
- 13%Every six months
- 3%Every two months or less
106 reviews
User reviews
- Good and affordable phone back in 2012-2013
Back in 2012-2013 I bought this phone because of it's camera and because it was affordable and small. And it did not let me down.
I actually wanted the S3, but a phone of that size simply does not fit in my pocket and I can't operate it with 1 hand. If I'd buy a phone larger than 13 centimetre long, I'd rather buy a tablet.
Then came the S3 Mini, which was the perfect alternative: small, reasonably hardware, good camera, not too expensive. And I still use the phone today (April 2017)!
It used to be a reasonably quick phone, but nowadays it is quite slow. But I've overstuffed the memory so that might have something to do with it.
The only thing I have disliked about the phone, is that only 5.5 GB of storage is available for the user. I can't seem to install apps on the SD card, which is why the storage of the internal memory card has been full, permanently, for the last 2 years.
Camera: good shots in good light conditions, but does not compare to newer phones of course.Pros- back in 2013: good camera in good light conditions
- back in 2013: good price/quality ratio
- not bulky, small size, operatable with small hands
Cons- internal memory (app size nowadays is too large for it)
- internal memory (half of it is filled by Samsung)
- 9.7
- Screen8.7
- Performance6.7
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoBefore, well. Today, a misery
Before it was a passable device. It met the needs of an average user with some extras like a voice assistant and a screen that even today looks nice and quality. Today it is unusable. It is not compatible with anything and inflates more batteries than a clown balloons. It is understandable for a cell phone launched 12 years ago
Pros- AMOLED screen
- voice assistant
- Additional features
Cons- Everything else
View original review- 3.1
- Screen4.5
- Performance0.6
- Camera3.0
- Connectivity3.6
- Battery0.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 18 days ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.