- 4.3"LowRes61% useful16:9
- 129 g 65.0 mm 128.7 mm 9.7 mm
- SnapD. 400 Dual-Core 1 GB RAM 8 GB
- v? 11.941
- 1750 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 IMX134 Exmor RS SELF 0.3 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean
Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 12%Less than half day
- 44%Less than a day
- 32%One day
- 12%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
- 8%It comes with a clean operating system
- 42%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 50%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 12%Once a year
- 24%Every six months
- 4%Every two months or less
- Good but is slow
I use for more than one year, it's a beautiful and hard to brake but the processor and front facing camera is very poor, the battery can last sometimes less than one day.Pros
- Screen quality
- Front camera
- Old Android
- Nice and curvy design handy phone.
Nice and curvy design handy phone.
Main shooter was awesome.
Selfie cam was useless.
Internal memory was too low, just 4 Gb
Ram was average for this type of phone but its kind of smooth, just 1 gb
I would like to buy it again if it comes with 3gb minimum ram, 64 gb internal and good bright selfie camera.Pros
- Main Camera
- Screen Colours
- Selfie Camera
- Internal Memory
- Good smartphone for undemanding
I buy used for 270 PLN (about 65€). I not demand from it too much, but it has one main weakness: memory for application which is only 1,56 GB. If I update all applicattions i can't download anything. But if I not do this I can download about 20 apps.
Another weakness of this phone are that it sometimes laggy. Almost everytime when i launch Messenger it comes with Application not responding and want's me to write an opinion. It get's annoying.
Positives are the music in this phone. I listen to music from this phone everytime I can. Equalizer is very good, but ClearAudio+ function works only in Music/Walkman app from Sony (I using Google Music). I also like design of this phone.Pros
- Sometimes laggy
- AutoLimited but functional
Despite the fact that in its day it had a standard configuration, it fell somewhat short for intensive use, which made it an ideal mobile for older people, children or people who generally make very superficial use of the functions of a smartphone. The design, characteristic of the Xperia of the time, was not particularly beautiful, but it helped the terminal to resist bumps and falls, provided they were not excessively strong.Pros
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 2.1 Design & Materials
- 1.9 Performance & Hardware
- 4.4 Camera
- 3.6 Connectivity
- 2.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.