you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Sony Xperia Z5 reviews by real users Sony Xperia Z5
- 5.2"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 157 g72.0 mm146.0 mm7.4 mm
- SnapD. 810 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 76.862
- 2900 mAh
- 1 23 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX300 Exmor RS SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.1.1 Nougat
User score
- 38
- 21
- 5
- 2
- 1
- Screen7.9
- Performance7.8
- Camera7.6
- Connectivity8.5
- Battery7.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
67 reviews
67 reviews
67 reviews
67 reviews
Performance & Hardware
67 reviews
67 reviews
67 reviews
Camera
67 reviews
67 reviews
67 reviews
67 reviews
Connectivity
67 reviews
67 reviews
67 reviews
Battery
- 3%Less than half day
- 27%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 28%More than one day
- 9%Two days or more
67 reviews
Software
- 7%It comes with a clean operating system
- 76%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 16%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
67 reviews
- 8%Never
- 12%Once a year
- 58%Every six months
- 23%Every two months or less
67 reviews
User reviews
- Great performance at a great price.
As per all other Xperia Z devices, the design is the same, which to me looks just great. Battery lasts around day and half with lots of screen usage.
Pros- Battery
- Waterproof
- Screen quality
Cons- Flashlight not bright enough
- Sound not high enough for calls
- 10
- Screen9.8
- Performance9.7
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.5
View answers - AutoNot a bad phone for that time, but not without its drawbacks.
After ZTE, the Japanese fell into my hands. And to be honest, I admit that I was very pleased with this phone at that time. A good camera, a pretty good processor and a more than attractive design with a pretty good memory size. But by the way, there are also disadvantages. For example, I remember very well how little this battery held a charge, well, think about it: 2900mah is not enough, but for a phone in 2015 it was worthy, even though there were already much cheaper phones on the market with more capacious batteries, and at the same time the battery itself simply got warm when charging . Of course, the price of the phone for a phone that is frankly weak in terms of autonomy.... To put it mildly, it’s too crazy, paying 36 tr for such a phone in 2017 is quite painful and I would even say it’s too expensive, but in 2015 it generally cost 70 tr.But basically I was happy with the device and used it for 2 whole years from 2017 to almost 2020, it was used both in terms of the main device and the spare one, and of course this smartphone could no longer handle programs normally in 2019 and in 2020 at all something could only perform the most basic functions that phones from 2018-2020 now do, and then I was able to sell it for 7tr. Of course, to my great surprise, you can buy this phone now, almost 9 years after the release of this phone, but as you hope you understand, I don’t recommend you do this unless you are some kind of collector, but the device is not bad for its time, although not without its downsides. Therefore, my rating is 6.8 points out of 10.
Pros- Camera
- Good performance
- Not a bad connection
- Has moisture protection
- Nice 2 stereo speakers
- Compact and lightweight, which makes it very comfortable in the hand
Cons- Battery
- The phone is too fragile
- The phone is too weak in terms of brightness
- Price for this phone
- Heats up hotter than an oven
- Performance
View original review- 6.8
- Screen4.7
- Performance4.6
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
Score
- 5.9 Design & Materials
- 4.7 Performance & Hardware
- 5.6 Camera
- 6.8 Connectivity
- 4.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.