- 5.5"UHD71% useful16:9
- 180 g 76.0 mm 154.4 mm 7.8 mm
- SnapD. 810 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 82.496
- 3430 mAh
- 1 23 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 IMX300 Exmor RS SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.1.1 Nougat
Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 3%Less than half day
- 7%Less than a day
- 48%One day
- 34%More than one day
- 7%Two days or more
- 4%It comes with a clean operating system
- 81%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 15%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 7%Once a year
- 64%Every six months
- 29%Every two months or less
- A good smartphone but ...
Every thing is good but it uses just 4 cores of the cpu. And it become hot when you use it very hard and record the 4k video upper than 30 minuets . At the end I have to say I tested it by cpu z program when I was playing very heavy games but it uses just 4 cores of this cpu .Positives
- Good touch
- 4k video
- Self camera
- Just using from 4 cores of cpu
- Become hot after 30 minuets using
- Not fan of this phone!
I got this phone from a friend and it was pretty beaten up in the first week of use. Makes me very angry when multi-tasking starts...lost my patience.Positives
- Many camera addons
- Big screen
- Heavy phone!
- Bad at multi-tasking
- Fingerprint scanner position
- Bad data reception
- Very slow charging
- AutoFirst and best of the Premium series
When it came out in November 2015 it was breathtaking, a magic offered above all by the promise (confirmed ..) of the prodigious display, especially the full black model (but also beautiful the Chrome), with those side frames in spectacular black metal, the premium quintessence. All this did not dispel any doubts for one of the best Sony tested ... there was always something that resisted maybe something was missing from the photos (Ok, sometimes excellent not always .., as in the whole Z5 series) and the autonomy penalized from the disastrous Snapdragon 810 processor, display at the bottom not so generous unlike the frames, also adding the portion of the keys. We could do more .. However, we often returned to the device, even after years. Excellent but in a period of tasty alternatives (Mate 8, V10, Nexus 6P, Iphone 6S but also some uncomfortable glare like Note 5).Positives
- Large and beautiful display IPS FHD unique
- general performance
- Daytime photos have good detail, credible colors
- portion frames
- photo in low light
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 7.3 Design & Materials
- 5.4 Performance & Hardware
- 6.5 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 5.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.