you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Ulefone Future reviews by real users Ulefone Future
- 5.5"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 185 g73.5 mm151.5 mm8.6 mm
- Helio P10 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 49.837
- 3000 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 S5K3P3 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow
User score
- 3
- 2
- 5
- 2
- 4
- Screen7.7
- Performance6.7
- Camera5.8
- Connectivity5.7
- Battery6.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Performance & Hardware
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Camera
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Connectivity
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Battery
- 13%Less than half day
- 25%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 38%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
16 reviews
Software
- 33%It comes with a clean operating system
- 60%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 7%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
16 reviews
- 50%Never
- 25%Once a year
- 25%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
16 reviews
User reviews
- AutoDisaster
Throw the money, disastrous, the first one I bought had a screen failure, I sent it to China to repair, about two months later it came back but with the same failure, I sent it back and after 4 or 5 months I got it changed for a new one, this one does not have the mistake, but it is the most mediocre and bad thing that I have bought, I do not recommend it at all, it works more or less well the first 6 months, and I believe that even that does not start a series of failures, screen, battery, etc.
Pros- Nothing
Cons- All
View original review- 0
- Screen7.8
- Performance0.0
- Camera1.8
- Connectivity3.3
- Battery0.0
View answers - Autogood phone with problems in 4G and Europe's networks
a malfunctioning mobile phone (screen that looks stuck, sometimes stuck and boot loops at start) Problem with fingerprint recognition (on the side like Sony)
Pros- fast phone
- beautiful construction
- good screen
Cons- quality of construction
- expensive for his money
View original review- 5.8
- Screen9.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 6.7
- Screen7.3
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity5.7
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoNice but ...
It is a terminal with a very nice design, curved screen that gives it a lot of elegance and gives it a perfect measurements, with a pretty good panel quality, were it not for those streaks and flickers that appear at times. A fat fault. By the way, a year without protection and no micro scratching, and I'm not very careful with it. GPS is worth to know in which province you are. As for connectivity, no problem. Battery for the day. It is fluid. The photos I expected were more, mediocre. It has 800 band, but not sreyo. Now I think it is worth around € 150. I do not recommend. A pity, because they knew how to design aesthetically and with caludad finishes, but there are flaws that can not be overlooked. Finally, maybe a little heavy, but gives strong feeling
Pros- Image quality
- Esthetic
Cons- Gps
- Screen failure
View original review- 4.1
- Screen8.3
- Performance5.0
- Camera3.8
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - 2
- Screen6.3
- Performance5.7
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity4.3
- Battery0.0
View answers- AutoNice mobile but not recommended
GPS quality is disastrous, takes a long time to locate and is easily lost. The fingerprint sensor worked the first month and then it did not work again. Short battery, most days do not arrive at night. Design and IPS panel of very good quality, although the aluminum frames are a bit fragile. The camera complies with its price.
Pros- Design
- screen
Cons- GPS
- NFC
- Battery
- Fingerprint sensor
View original review- 4.7
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.7
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity3.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - 7.6
- Screen8.8
- Performance8.3
- Camera7.3
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoA VERY BAD INVESTMENT
I have the terminal just 7 months and stopped working the antenna receives no signal and has been the overnight, the GPS is useless from the start and if you put the brightness to more than half appear rallas as if he had broken the screen. The phone is nice nobody can deny and has good quality screen, but only that. Not a ergonomico Termial since the touch is very thin and easily slips if you have no case. The battery from the month began to have a shorter life so mobile but segia restore the same, apparently vitiates very easily. And finally in the photographic section, good light makes very good pictures but low light can not see anything and flash instead of fixing them worse photos. So I think I have thrown away 200 €.
Pros- Good pictures in good light
Cons- All
View original review- 0
- Screen4.8
- Performance6.0
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity4.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoPretty bad
I thought that this phone would be a great buy: first images leave something to be desired, the battery does not reach 24 hours of use, if I put the brightness to more than half, the display start lines of color appear as if broken, the GPS does not work anything, and microphone to record gets bad enough sound, we must speak very loud, also sometimes having the curved screen the letters that are sticking to the edges do not work, and I have to put the phone horizontally to write, in conclusion, a disappointment.
Pros- display quality
Cons- Battery
- Camera
- GPS
- Brightness
- Microphone
View original review- 3.3
- Screen4.3
- Performance3.3
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity3.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.