?

UMi London reviews by real users Umi London

User score

Overall satisfaction
Not enough reviews
4 reviews
  • Screen7.0
  • Performance6.0
  • Camera6.1
  • Connectivity7.9
  • Battery7.0
Want to comment on the Umi London?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
6.3

4 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
7.8

4 reviews

Is it comfortable?
7.3

4 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
6.5

4 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
6.3

4 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
6.8

4 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
5.0

4 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
7.8

4 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
5.3

4 reviews

Quality of selfies
5.0

4 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
6.7

4 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
7.8

4 reviews

Quality of the GPS
7.8

4 reviews

And the WiFi?
8.3

4 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 0%
    Less than half day
  • 0%
    Less than a day
  • 100%
    One day
  • 0%
    More than one day
  • 0%
    Two days or more

4 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 0%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 67%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 33%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

4 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 50%
    Never
  • 50%
    Once a year
  • 0%
    Every six months
  • 0%
    Every two months or less

4 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Auto
    "Improvable".

    I had it for 2 years, and the truth is that the performance in general is good. Fluid in daily use, but with games it costs and does not go well. It is noted that it is a low-end mobile, because of its finishes, the degradation of the color of the aluminum side edges with the passage of time is highly appreciated and the plastic finish of the casing is noticeable. The battery is very scarce, it lasted me 1 day, but then I had to load twice a day if I used it moderately. I did not get any update of the system by art of the company during the 2 years that I had the mobile, which would have to be more persevering in that. The camera is not bad, but you can see that it is low-end and it is very improvable, but for the price it cost me it turned out to be a good mobile phone that defends itself in daily use, even if it has its "handicaps".

    Pros
    • Fluency.
    • Design.
    • Resistant to falls and blows.
    Cons
    • Updates
    • Battery
    • Rear camera / selfie.
    • Finishing quality.
    • 6.3
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance6.6
    • Camera6.5
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    A good smartphone for what I paid it ..

    I did not pay so expensive there, so do not expect that met all expectations. The battery is for now, in two months of use, which left more to be desired as it unloads very fast. Anyway, it was worth buying.

    Pros
    • Design
    • Great signal reception, both 3G as WIFI
    Cons
    • Battery
    • very minimal accessories
    • 8.1
    • Screen7.5
    • Performance6.0
    • Camera7.3
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    I did not like

    I did not like, but is functional, design and conectivadad leaves much to be desired, I prefer my Uhans A101 with a very fine design. www.uhans.cc

    • 5.4
    • Screen4.8
    • Performance6.0
    • Camera5.5
    • Connectivity5.7
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Not the most powerful, but very priyatnyё impressions of the device which is very desheno

    Disadvantages; - Multitouch only two fingers and not work correctly when you click on one level, but sometimes it is extremely rare - there is no 4G - the battery is sufficiently small capacity - enough RAM, but for the money more hardly find Pluses: - good screen - a nice design / aluminum frame - fall protection (not yet had a chance to test) - 2-sim card and memory card - all in different slots

    • 10
    • Screen8.3
    • Performance5.3
    • Camera5.0
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery7.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
?
Ki Cost-effective
Score
Not available
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.