you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Wiko Bloom reviews by real users Wiko Bloom
- 4.7"LCD IPSLowRes5:3
- 145 g71.5 mm138.5 mm9.4 mm
- MT6582 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM 4 GB
- v? 17.453
- 2000 mAh
- 1 5 Mpx · Unknow SELF 1.9 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Bands
- Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat
User score
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 2
- 3
- Screen5.1
- Performance2.9
- Camera3.1
- Connectivity6.4
- Battery3.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Performance & Hardware
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Camera
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Connectivity
8 reviews
8 reviews
8 reviews
Battery
- 38%Less than half day
- 50%Less than a day
- 0%One day
- 13%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
8 reviews
Software
- 14%It comes with a clean operating system
- 43%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 43%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
8 reviews
- 100%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 0%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
8 reviews
User reviews
- AutoIt broke no longer lights up
When he reached the second year he broke down, the screen presented the Ghost touch problem. Screen changed for free in assistance but continued to give the same problem. Lately I wanted to use it as a surveillance camera but it doesn't turn on anymore. Experience with Wiko almost enough
View original review- 3.7
- Screen6.2
- Performance5.3
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoCheap phone
I bought this phone due to dual sim. He never convinced me but needed a HOTSPOT in the office that would allow me to have a personal internet connection. (HOTSPOT never given any problems). The glass of the phone broke up after a few months after the purchase. (I bought one online and replaced personally). Overall, it has never been a sufficient phone for constructive and functional quality. I do not recommend buying.
Pros- Data signal reception
Cons- Low quality construction material
View original review- 0.6
- Screen2.8
- Performance0.3
- Camera1.3
- Connectivity7.7
- Battery5.0
View answers - 1.2
- Screen2.3
- Performance0.0
- Camera1.8
- Connectivity3.3
- Battery0.0
View answers- AutoPsst ...
My experience with this mobile has been very good, really. It is not a luxury mobile, but meets expectations. I was lucky that my left me good and I was more or less well. I ended up happy.
Pros- Rear camera. Within bad it is very good
- GPS
- Design and colors
- More or less good performance
Cons- cameras
- SO, RAM and processor old
- Battery
View original review- 7.4
- Screen7.3
- Performance4.0
- Camera3.8
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.