you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the YotaPhone 2
- 5"AMOLEDFHD16:9
- 145 g69.4 mm144.9 mm9.0 mm
- SnapD. 801 Quad-Core 2 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 45.985
- 2500 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 SELF 2.1 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4.2 KitKat
User score
- 5
- 5
- 2
- 2
- 1
- Screen8.5
- Performance6.9
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity7.4
- Battery6.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Performance & Hardware
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Camera
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Connectivity
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Battery
- 13%Less than half day
- 13%Less than a day
- 60%One day
- 13%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
15 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 93%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 7%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
15 reviews
- 8%Never
- 46%Once a year
- 38%Every six months
- 8%Every two months or less
15 reviews
User reviews
- A wow phone with 2 screens. It is adequate phone on front screen with OLED screen but aging specs. Camera just average , with good sound. Other Chinese phones now have 2 screens but yotaphone has best software. Most people buy the Chinese yd206 and flash
- 7.1
- Screen8.3
- Performance7.3
- Camera5.8
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Second e-ink screen was awesome and the build quality was great. On the other hand the Snapdragon 801 was too hot very often and finally fried...
The second e-ink screen is a great idea and it is very well used by the software. Unfortunately, the app developers did not follow and except the integrated apps, there was no other interesting apps supporting the dual screen. The build quality is awesome and and accessories of very good quality too. The real bad side is the heat... The Snapdragon 801 is known to be hot and the dual screen does not help to cool it down ! As a result, it is often running very hot and for me, it finally died all by itself by getting too hot (after 1,5 years only and without using it intensively...). The other bad side is battery life. The e-ink screen was like a promise to get extra battery life but in the end, it last a maximum of a day (probably because of this Sanpdragon 801...).
Pros- Dual e-ink screen
- Good build quality
- Good quality accessories
- Not too big
Cons- Runs very hot (without reason)
- Snapdragon 801 (heating, not reliable)
- Abandoned by developers and manufacturer
- 8.2
- Screen7.3
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.3
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoInnovative and at a good price
Seeing the ink screen, reading, using it to scan codes is amazing and the way the applications change with each other is wonderful, I wish the Chinese and Russian versions that had better support would have been better integrated. The initial price was very expensive but later it was an excellent price and also the wonderful presentation. Even these days there are mobiles with lower specifications at higher prices and 2 GB with 16 GB, this has 2GB and 32 GB, a custom rom is required
Pros- Dual screen, eink and lcd
- NFC
- RAM and ROM
Cons- No double sim
- Small battery
- Update difficulty
View original review- 9.4
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 4
- Screen9.5
- Performance4.3
- Camera2.7
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoI can not refuse this phone until something comes out with an E-INK-screen, NFC, wireless / charging and a large battery.
An ideal smartphone that has not had a worthy alternative for 4 years already. Always used atypical form factors from a rotator to a modular smartphone. But the dual-display device with E-Ink, which feels great in the summer on bright sunny days and perfectly copes with the role of an e-book + a permanent weather / time / notification monitor is unrivaled. YotaPhone 3 turned out to be uninteresting because of the sagging characteristics with respect to other flagships. BlackBerry sold to the Chinese. Nokia and Sony lost interest in design. The world came to the bricks and the clone
Pros- Design for a round pebble with a small thickness
- Second screen E-Ink
- Experience with YotaMirror and software for E-INK
- AMOLED screen with natural black
- Energy-saving modes
Cons- The battery is very weak (2500 mAh, quickly worn out)
- Fragile body and lack of water protection
- Audiotrakt weak, substandard, sound quiet
- There are problems in the software - greyness E-Ink
- Android 6 did not bring to mind, abandoned the development
View original review- 9.2
- Screen9.3
- Performance7.7
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoVery good screen, good materials.
Good screen, Oled, PPI above average, very manageable, fast load, resistant. It does not have a rayon, if you take care of it. The technical service responds in one day. Because it is a good mobile. For powerful games, not just battery, the back screen is cool but lacks backlighting. The design is cool but without a slip slips a lot. For the day to day it takes a lot. On the highway it loses coverage, for me its blackest fault.
Pros- Price
- materials
- Oled screen
- Ink screen
Cons- Road coverage
- Just battery
View original review- 9.2
- Screen10
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIn short, if you want to ponktnutsya before the village, you can take, Tipo 2 screens, and so bullshit
I'll say it right. I bought Alik for almost a year, as during that time I failed me, especially when shooting near the sea, the pool, the river, and even if I put a waterproof cover on it, he brakes the horror and it's impossible to capture the photo. Photos he good are 1 time out of 10 attempts approximately. Well, what I was counting on for 8m with a 8Mp camera. Games played rarely and then not heavy, and the processor of the bitch is so hot that fry the eggs on it. Many who this phone saw all asked to see, because no one I have not seen it from people I know. wondered at the sight
View original review- 3.6
- Screen7.3
- Performance5.3
- Camera4.0
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoGreat idea, poor quality
Great idea of the double screen. Besides charging wireless, NFC, ..., but in two months of intense use it stops working and there is no possible arrangement. The Chinese-Russian after-sales service is regrettable. I do not advise
Pros- Double screen
- NFC
- Wireless charge
Cons- Far below the motives of the moment it leaves
- Painful quality
View original review- 1.2
- Screen8.8
- Performance7.0
- Camera4.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - 7.9
- Screen9.8
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.3
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.