you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
ZTE Blade V6 reviews by real users ZTE Blade V6
- 5"LCD IPSHD16:9
- 122 g69.5 mm142.0 mm6.8 mm
- MT6735 Quad-Core 2 GB RAM 16 GB
- v6 29.939
- 2200 mAh
- 1 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 OV13850 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.0.2 Lollipop
User score
- 8
- 5
- 3
- 7
- 0
- Screen7.3
- Performance5.7
- Camera6.4
- Connectivity7.1
- Battery5.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Performance & Hardware
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Camera
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Connectivity
23 reviews
23 reviews
23 reviews
Battery
- 13%Less than half day
- 39%Less than a day
- 26%One day
- 17%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
23 reviews
Software
- 9%It comes with a clean operating system
- 52%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 39%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
23 reviews
- 79%Never
- 11%Once a year
- 5%Every six months
- 5%Every two months or less
23 reviews
User reviews
- AutoTerrible, when they gave it to me and now too
The screen was full of white leaks that made it unpleasant to use, it was scratched with the eyes, its audio was canned and its performance was so bad that with free fire it overheated. Terrible mobile, from here to the moon.
Pros- Design
- Portability
Cons- Nonexistent updates
- Bad Audio
- poor performance
- Screen
- loading port
View original review- 3.3
- Screen5.7
- Performance3.3
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoTop for his age
As it works very well for its age, I tested it on a demanding game and I will say that it can compete with redmi 9t in some games. But he has already outlived his own and some applications no longer support. It was pleasant for me to use it, now it is lying and waiting for repair, like a dialer and ruining tapes, it is good.
View original review- 10
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - 6.4
- Screen6.7
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity1.6
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoGood phone for super basic use
In general the phone today looks elegant, since its body is made of aluminum that feels and looks great. Network performance is good, however as far as games leave much to be desired. The cameras are something very unpleasant. Since they do not have good quality, except in extremely optimal conditions. Audio is badly heard above 75%. The battery lasts half a day.
Pros- Connectivity
- screen
Cons- performance
- Battery
- Camera
- software
View original review- 6.3
- Screen9.5
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery0.0
View answers - 3.3
- Screen4.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera3.0
- Connectivity3.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 year ago
Score
- 5.2 Design & Materials
- 4.6 Performance & Hardware
- 5.2 Camera
- 4.6 Connectivity
- 4.5 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.