I acquired it a few days ago as a second device for € 100 from a trusted person. The screen is worthy of a premium range of its generation, more than 560 ppi and a very high maximum brightness. It is in these aspects where it gives the chest and it becomes obvious, with respect to my Xiaomi Mi10T, the difference between high-end and premium-end in the manufacture of a panel (both IPS and with 2 years of difference. Obviously it stays at 60hz Being from 2018. The performance with the SD845 is quite good, being comparable to an upper-mid-range processor of today (for example, the SD765). Very good sound. Decent cameras but that at this point already lack certain properties or capabilities compared to the competition Very light and quality design And passable software.
The refresh rate is absurdly good and addictive. Absolutely superior to most of its competitors in that regard. The IPS screen looks great, the panel quality is 8.25, and if we weigh it up with the 144Hz refresh rate for me it's an easy 9.25. Little to say about the processor and performance. It is not fast, it is instantaneous. Brutal. It is impossible to tickle him. Regarding the cameras, I cannot comment because I have not squeezed them enough. The autonomy is very good even in my hands, being a very very demanding user. A normal user will reach the end of the day with 40% battery life easily.
I have been using the One Plus 7 Pro as a personal terminal for a couple of weeks, and I would like to analyze very briefly the characteristics of what for me is the best premium terminal range that you can buy today. Starting, I think the design of this smartphone is spectacular, it is a terminal aimed at people who like to carry a large device to consume multimedia content. All this they have achieved without sacrificing in design, because thanks to its pop-up camera and its use of the front, along with its curved screen and construction, I think it stands out in this area. Regarding the hardware, little to say. Better specifications that exist. Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, UFS 3.0 technology for storage, and configurations (specifically the one I use) of up to 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage. Bestial. The screen is in the TOP 3, no doubt, bestial those 90hz and resolution (515
This terminal had my father, in contract with a company, and I used it for a long time because at that time I did not have one of my own. I think we should not go into too many details to understand this terminal. In 2011, the range of access was already disastrous (with something more than the price of this device you could buy today a Xiaomi Mi A2 4 + 64), but we found that the price-quality ratio of this was even below of the average. Its strong point, the resistance. Your weak points, everything else. Very loose this device, even for its moment.
This device was acquired in January 2018 to make the gift of it to my partner. Finally, due to a break of my Xiaomi Mi Note 3 a couple of weeks ago, I have been using it until the arrival of my new device, and I would like to share this experience of use. First of all, I would like to emphasize that I bought this terminal for a price of € 199 in a Spanish store, always to keep my consequent valuations in context. It is a terminal that during the end of 2017 and throughout 2018 was a great terminal with a great price. On the other hand, as of 2019, we already have terminals that give this price range an unprecedented complexity of choice (such as Mi A2 Lite or Redmi Note 7). All of them have more updated designs (notably in addition) with better performance (the Snapdragon 625 can not compete against the Redmi 660), in autonomy, and even in photographic capacity
Despite being a terminal that once cost as little as 120 or 140 €, and taking into account that the low and medium ranges were much less powerful and nourished in 2013 than today, I caused too many problems, and I had knowledge of so many people who had many problems of fluency, not only at the level of performance, which with such RAM is understandable, if not with poor optimization, constant blocks and exit applications and problems when performing relatively easy tasks.
It is indisputable that the quality / price ratio of this device is amazing. I got it through GeekBuying a fair year ago, for € 320 + € 25 at customs. In general, a great mobile for its price, highlighting the speed of the processor, the density of pixels per inch, and portrait mode. The OS seems very appropriate, at least the layer of MIUI that it carries. Fantastic purchase
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.