Devices

I want it

Smartphones

Add the smartphones that you love
and would like to have in your hands

Alerts

  • No alerts

User Reviews

  • Auto
    One and only

    For me maintenance is a very relevant thing, so Sony has always been repulsed, the device broke the screen and a defect in the battery, erases from nothing regardless of the load, almost nobody knows and likes to move. In other words, it broke away, it becomes paperweight. Sony's system is messy, messed up, blocked, I didn't adapt. Its strengths are the chipset that even old impresses you with the performance, even today. And another is the carcass, it's too beautiful. To close, something that is particular is not to like the Sony cameras in a Sony, I don't see sharpness, just noise and grainy, even more in the photos at night, colors burst and washed.

    Pros
    • Performance
    • Construction
    Cons
    • System
    • Cameras
    • 3.6
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance9.0
    • Camera4.5
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Terrible

    I searched and didn't find the Galaxy x, so here are two reviews. Grand prime What I remember about this device is the following, it fell broke, and to complete the range when the screen cracked the touch stopped. To add the recipe, the processing together with the memories didn't do the job so it was slow, it was very slow. This one really didn't have a compliment to add. Along with all this there was an even worse problem, the lack of updating. I thought the problem was the cheap models and I was surprised that no, I had devices like ace, ace plus, grand prime exe all suffered from updating, some did not even receive new android. Galaxy X An expensive cell phone like this one will receive an update on the fuse to leave Samsung and never come back. The cell phone was very good, its very curved screen drew attention, good processing, I didn't have expandable memory.

    Pros
    • ?
    Cons
    • Construction
    • Performance
    • Autonomy
    • Loading
    • Update
    • 1.8
    • Screen5.0
    • Performance2.6
    • Camera7.2
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    King of cost benefit

    My second xiaomi, excellent, resistant, very beautiful. Positive point: as miui manages its autonomy well, it makes the 660 chipset look economical, draining only when it requires the graphics card. Another very positive point is the quality of the screen, as it is pleasant, intensity of brightness, color fidelity, the only defect is the whitish black because it is LCD, but otherwise it is phenomenal. The rear cameras think that they meet the expectations for the price range, but when installed the gcam the thing is out of the ordinary, the richness of details, the balance of light, night shots. Negative point: The front camera is terrible, its predecessors perform the services much better than him, all due to the tendency, notch drop that has taken over the market. Summary: For everyday use it is excellent, great screen brightness, fast loading, very satisfactory performance, I have no interest in changing anytime soon.

    Pros
    • Miui
    • Performance
    • Autonomy
    • Screen
    Cons
    • Selfie camera
    • 8.9
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance8.0
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity8.6
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Disappointment

    What the moto g (1 generation) was a success was the disappointment, same system and much more screen, resulted in little processing, little memory, a lot of slowness, falling and breaking the screen very easily, the battery didn't last. Anyway, lousy.

    Pros
    • Sound
    Cons
    • Construction
    • Performance
    • Autonomy
    • 2.3
    • Screen6.2
    • Performance4.6
    • Camera5.7
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Asus is Asus

    Defect? Update, I also have a zenfone 3 and has a lot more update, even today it is on Android 7.1, asus blunder. Besides, excellent device, amoled screen (not as good as a Samsung) that unites two things, a good screen with surprising image quality and a long-lasting battery, the set is an excellent screen with the Snapdragon 625, the result of great autonomy with performance within an ultra thin designer. Only the 18: 9 standard is needed to be perfect.

    Pros
    • Amoled screen
    • Designer
    • Cameras
    • Set
    Cons
    • Outdated Android
    • 7.1
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance8.0
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity8.3
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Could be better

    I started against it and after that I had an ace at the same time. He was far superior in everything, incomparable. His defect, which at the time had no update release by Google itself, so it was dependent on brands, and whoever had a low-cost or intermediate Samsung was very much at hand, and even some top of the line too.

    Pros
    • Autonomy
    • Screen
    • Performance
    Cons
    • Update
    • 6.5
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance8.0
    • Camera6.5
    • Connectivity7.3
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    If it doesn't exist it wouldn't be missed

    Positive point: Very ergonomic for the day-to-day, quality and signal of the connection is something that surprises. End of praise. Lamented by the lack of purposeful information he should have come with a snapdragon but they traded it for a low cost mediatek. Negative points: The sound of bad cars but you can survive, I don't know why to put 4gb ram / 64gb rom if it's the worst on the market, access is too slow, in any scenario of use, processing is shameful, slow, bad managed, adding the low battery you drain easily arriving at noon you despair for charging and it’s slow it takes a long time to fully charge, the cameras I don’t even need to have, it’s so bad that you don’t even want to take a picture, ask anybody person who is on your side who will do better. I would be ashamed to say that it has a military certificate, it even resists well, but it is to put in your pocket and scratch and be branded. Did I mention it's slow and lousy with autonomy?

    Pros
    • Ergonomics
    • Wide resolution
    • Calls sign
    Cons
    • Screen
    • External files
    • Battery
    • Memoirs
    • Processing
    • Cameras (all)
    • 1
    • Screen7.7
    • Performance2.6
    • Camera2.2
    • Connectivity7.3
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    It even works

    Years later I come to talk about this device again, it was so good that I got another Xiaomi. What a sturdy device, withstands the day-to-day life very easily, falls does not harm you at all, sins a little in performance more easily rewarding for its exaggerated, incomparable autonomy, miui works miracles. Its front camera loses to the note 6 pro (the most well resolved brother) but it gives a bath in the note 7. Given the price, the quality of the screen is a detail, not beautiful but well resolved. An effort to get the 4gb ram / 64gb rom model is very worthwhile

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Miui
    • Resistance
    Cons
    • Standard USB
    • Bounced camera
    • Screen
    • 7.9
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera8.2
    • Connectivity8.3
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Years and still powerful

    The quality of the construction is phenomenal, it restored time and falls very well, the back cover after many years peeled off, several times it became my spare cell phone and is still being used today, of course "forcing the bar", lives in dependence from powebank, out of battery it almost doesn't reach 2 hours, even at the time the battery was its defect. As it is very old it doesn't update anymore, it was a great experience, you saw in practice Asus' dedication in bringing a good experience. The performance in games was something absurd, intermediate cell phones 2 years apart were left behind and a lot. His strong point was the camera, the famous "owl", the artificial intelligence was very lame and you depended on him understanding that it was dark for the button to appear and almost always made mistakes but when you used it it was fantastic, it was a photo in pitch without flash , nowadays it has resources that are equal and even better, but years after the launch I saw it have very good results.

    Pros
    • Materials
    • Screen
    • Camera
    • Performance
    Cons
    • Battery
    • Size
    • 8.4
    • Screen8.5
    • Performance7.3
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    List of the worst phones

    It is the greatest example that there is no point in doing everything if you don't do anything right, that is, the stereo is jaw-dropping today, the 5.5 screen was a revolution at the time even more Full HD, the reader fulfilled his role, talking like that until it looks good, but no, it was so bad in defects that in accounting it was negative, too much resource, too much function that you didn’t use or totally unnecessary and the basics that you should do right were terrible, and it got older and it got even worse, if installing three programs was already necessary to be slow, it slowed a lot, the patience you had to have to open the camera, you had to start a mantra to not throw it on the wall. To open a YouTube was suffering, then you have to ask yourself, why is the safe zone, nfc and other functions raging to open a browser? In summary, it's so bad that I didn't even have the courage to sell it, it became scrap.

    Pros
    • Stereo sound
    • Clean sound
    • Screen 5.5
    • Effective digital
    Cons
    • Camera
    • Construction
    • System
    • Hardware
    • Update
    • 1.4
    • Screen6.5
    • Performance3.3
    • Camera2.5
    • Connectivity5.6
    • Battery5.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Badges

  • 1 Vote
  • 3 Votes
  • 5 Votes
  • 10 Votes
  • 15 Votes
  • 25 Votes
  • 50 Votes
  • 75 Votes
  • Comment
  • Bronze Comment
  • Silver Comment
  • Gold Comment
  • Expert
  • Kimovil Staff