you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Blackview Shark 8 reviews by real users Blackview Shark 8
- 6.78"LCD IPSFHD+21:9
- 198 g76.6 mm168.5 mm8.4 mm
- Helio G99 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 420.000
- 5000 mAh
- 1 64 Mpx · ƒ/1.69 GW3 23SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- Screen8.1
- Performance8.2
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.2
- Battery7.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Performance & Hardware
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Camera
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Connectivity
4 reviews
4 reviews
4 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 25%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 25%More than one day
- 25%Two days or more
4 reviews
Software
- 25%It comes with a clean operating system
- 75%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
4 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 100%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
4 reviews
User reviews
- AutoFor the money they ask for it on Alika, this is the best choice. If it were stereo it would be perfect.Pros
- Performance 4/5. Social networks - 5, CarX - 2/5
- 120Hz Bright IPS screen and good battery life
- Camera: day 5, evening 4-5, night 3-5. Same as for GW3.
- The sound is clear, loud, bassy (sorry there is only one speaker)
- The body is well assembled, there is no play or creaking
- Complete set ALLin (case, glass, film glued)
Cons- Stereo sound - but the price will be "50 bucks higher"
- Automatic brightness adjustment is lame, but you get used to it
- The dimensions are a little big, but watching the content is HIGH
- Because of the dimensions, you need to think about where to put it.
- a metal body would not hurt (to give it rigidity)
- THIS IS A PLUS - the price is super, I got it for $90 8/128
View original review- 9
- Screen7.6
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery10
View answers - 9.2
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 19 days ago
- Features 2 months ago
- Version 4 months ago
- AnTuTu Version 6 months ago
- AnTuTu 6 months ago
- Market 6 months ago
- Name, Storage 6 months ago
- Aliases, Height, Thickness, Weight, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Fast charge, Flash, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Photos, Photos 6 months ago
Score
- 6.3 Design & Materials
- 7.0 Performance & Hardware
- 6.7 Camera
- 6.0 Connectivity
- 7.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.