- 5.5"HD70% useful16:9
- 184 g 77.0 mm 153.0 mm 8.3 mm
- MT6580 Quad-Core 2 GB RAM 16 GB
- v6 22.800
- 3000 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · Unknow IMX219 Exmor RS SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/--
- 3G2 bands
- 2G4 bands
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Note from users
Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 6%Less than half day
- 33%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 28%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
- 6%It comes with a clean operating system
- 83%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 11%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 0%Once a year
- 11%Every six months
- 28%Every two months or less
- Great phone for the price, promises a little too much on the camera side of things.
Good simple design, nice grip diamond back feature and premium look and weight, removable battery and dual sim. OS is customized but free from resource leaks. Its a well optimized OS. Storage and performance are above average for a handset of this price. If you were to believe the hype this phone 'is all about the camera' well it isn't! Theres been a few OTA updates to improve response of the camera, in good daylight its a fine sony sensor, any low light at all it has problems, all in all its above average for its price range and competitors. With moderate use the battery surprised me, you'll get 1 - 2 days. I'm happy with it.Positives
- Design and feel
- 2Gb Ram, nice and snappy
- Big bright screen
- Camera is ok
- Camera not up to the hype
- Slow to charge ( big battery )
- Speaker a bit quiet
- No Ambient light sensor
- No notification LED
The design it handles is quite nice, but as it is plastic it can be damaged easily. The power goes well to be an economic mobile, satisfies the needs. As for your battery if you could get up to date with moderate use. The camera only takes good pictures by day, but you can ask for a super cheap mobile phone. And with mobile connectivity, it has much to envy to other terminals that are around its price, at least in Peru is not compatible with half of telephone operators. The microphone of the cell phone in some terminals has to be sent to solder again, as it happened to me, that simply using the mobile will get to break the cables because it is too thin, this is a factory assembly error.Positives
- Large 5.5 ''
- Badly ensembled
- Mobile Cover
- AutoIt is an attractive mobile, battery surprised me.
Battery surprised me for good, I lasted more than a day doing basic use of WhatsApp and social networks. The camera is good in broad daylight, even if it costs a little more focus than usual, but to enlarge the photos keeps popping noise, but for this price, it defends itself. The front camera seemed bad. In short, my elephone p6000 as I like photo. Outside the mobile is aesthetically appealing. The microphone failed me from the beginning and during the 3 months of use (why I gave it back). Speaker sound pretty good. The screen is not easily scratched and comes with a protective glass.Positives
- It's nice and comfortable
- Resistant to bumps and scratches
- Front camera.
- Some lag in games
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 5.6 Design & Materials
- 3.7 Performance & Hardware
- 3.4 Camera
- 2.4 Connectivity
- 4.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.