Design & Materials
Performance & Hardware
- 3%Less than half day
- 7%Less than a day
- 24%One day
- 55%More than one day
- 10%Two days or more
- 55%It comes with a clean operating system
- 34%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 10%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
- 21%Once a year
- 24%Every six months
- 55%Every two months or less
- inconstant experience
for now ,ive been using this phone for over a month and i can say it's a very beautiful phone ,similar to the iphone X with shiny glass in the back ,but it slippery and easy to scratch , a 2.5D glass and some type of protection on the front ,the phone comes with a stock android with a snappy experience but some times the system can be a bit laggy even for such a powerful SOC ,as for the cameras , i gotta be honest the main camera is good but cant say more than that ,the color is a bit washed out and they are not vibrant ,on the contrary the front camera is much better with the colors and sharpness ,the battery is good get me through the day with moderate use with a SOT of 6-7 hours and if you want to juice up there always that QC3.0 with type C to fill you up in just an hour and half,overall the phone is very good for moderate users with a very good selfie shouter for selfie loverPositives
- SOC (SD626)
- Selfie Camera
- Type C with QC3.0
- Stock Android
- Back Camera
- AutoHe promised more than he actually delivered.
After some pretty good experiences with other bq models, this was a real sad fiasco. The camera that promised to be exceptional, especially for night photos, was not good at all and at night terrible. The general fluidity was conspicuous by its absence, the screen and everything else were very ordinary. In general and due to the sale price, even with some good offer, it was excessively overvalued, even more so compared to the rest of the models of other brands. I couldn't bear it for half a year.
- AutoMobile very practical and good quality-price when I bought it.
Its design is attractive but as always for tastes colors, in a year it has not failed me anything and it is still as fluid as the first day, even with 30 apps and thousands of more photos, in summary a mobile phone of 9.5 out of 10 with very few sticks, the only one that I put is that the battery could last longer but before (a year ago), there was the same technology that is coming now. Although there was already fast charging so no problem :).Positives
- Fast charge
- AutoBalanced Medium Range
Beautiful design, very good camera for the price that the mobile phone has, plenty of power for apps from day to day without messing with demanding games. Everything in connectivity (radio fm, NFC, Galileo, etc.). Above all, highlight Android Stock !! Super balanced I call him the Spanish cousin of the Pixels.Positives
- Android Stock
- Too big frames
Great premium midrange device, solvent processor (snpdr 626) that runs very smoothly for the Android stock experience, cameras well above the current midrange, fingerprint sensor that meets and great connectivity with everything you need. If you are looking for a mobile that responds to you in all situations this is your device .. Bravo bq! ... solved the scroll problem in Chrome with the November 2017 update ... after a year and a half with the follow-up fluid as the first day, it will update to android 9 foot and still get security patches, good job by part of bq. Today I still take about 6 hours screen thing that with my previous phone (Sony Z2) a year and a half barely reached the 3 hours screen so the strong point of bq as is the battery is still in your linePositives
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- 5.9 Design & Materials
- 5.9 Performance & Hardware
- 6.8 Camera
- 5.7 Connectivity
- 5.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.