you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Honor 200 Smart reviews by real users Honor 200 Smart
- 6.8"TFT LCD (IPS)FHD+20:9
- 193 g76.8 mm166.9 mm8.2 mm
- SnapD. 4 Gen2 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 256 GB
- 456.552 v10
- 5200 mAh 35 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 3
- 5
- 0
- 1
- 2
- Screen7.1
- Performance5.8
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity8.2
- Battery7.1
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it an entry-level phone with an acceptable quality-price ratio for basic use. However, opinions are highly polarized, with some deeming it very good and others, the worst they've ever tried, especially if it's not the 8GB version.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz IPS screen is decent and of a good size, although some note that its quality could be improved and report touch issues.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is highly variable; the 8GB version is fluid for multitasking and light gaming, but the 4GB version is slow and frustrating.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the camera is a weak point, considered intermediate or even "horrendous", slow to shoot, and with room for improvement in video.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is good, highlighting 5G, NFC, VoLTE, and VoWIFI, although Bluetooth is perceived as somewhat outdated.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is fantastic, offering up to two days of autonomy with moderate use, although fast charging is only adequate.
- 9%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 55%One day
- 36%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
11 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 91%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 9%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
11 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 100%Every six months
- 0%Every two months or less
11 reviews
- AutoI've had it and I don't really think it's such a bad device, but it does have some weak points worth highlighting.
I have it and the truth is that it is quite good, I like its battery since it lasts a long time and even more with the saver, the multitasking is very good as long as you have the 8Gb version, I like the design a bit and even more since I have it in lunar white, anyway it could be an option that is used for day to day with multitasking and playing games that are not that heavy but oh well
Pros- Decent performance
- 120 Hz on the screen
- Multitasking
- 8GB of RAM recommended
- Play smoothly in less demanding games
Cons- It can be scratched, with my experience I have noticed that it has scratched a little.
- A little bad in demanding or medium demanding games
- It doesn't have 60 fps
- Sometimes it gets hot but not that much
- IPS screen
- High average price
View original review- 7.8
- Screen6.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoDECENTLY EQUIPPED ENTRY RANGE MOBILE
I've been using it daily for a few months, and I'm not going to say anything new about what has already been said. In my case, I got it for €109 on the simyo website. You have to take into account the price of the terminal, what features it has and what we want to use it for. Having said that, I conclude that for everyday use, without expecting much, it's up to par: RRSS, email, YT, streaming, GPS... Basic use, nothing more. The battery stands out, it can last a day and a half, two. Decent and generous screen. Fast charging is just right, but appreciated when the time comes. Good sound, NFC, somewhat outdated bluetooth (maybe 5.2 would have been good), NFC, VoLTE, voWIFI (they work on digi, simyo). That said, the processor falls short, it lags a lot, it crashes, it takes a while to respond to fingerprint unlocking... Just like the famous 4 + 4, meh. On the subject of updates, A15 and A16, with quarterly updates in security patches. It has 5G, which is also not a trivial issue. A phone to battle with, if one does not want to spend a lot of money, and is looking for a basic model, it is not a bad option.
Pros- Screen (size)
- Battery
- Sound
Cons- Processor
- RAM
- Screen type
- Medium
View original review- 6.1
- Screen6.2
- Performance5.6
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt serves little purpose
It's a phone that doesn't perform under normal use. It gets "stuck" all the time. The RAM it offers is virtual as standard and that makes it awful. Even being cheap you're going to feel cheated. The camera is horrible and the camera app is very slow. Everything on the phone is slow. You get used to it, but it becomes a normal phone (calls, whatsapps and little else) for normal smartphone use you're going to go crazy. Watching a tiktok at any time can become impossible. I bought two, both have broken camera glass. One fell from a chair to the floor, the other when I left it on a marble table in a bar. If you just bought it, return it.
Pros- It will break soon and you will replace it
- Design, it will fool you.
Cons- RAM
- Slow
- Camera
- Fragility
View original review- 1.3
- Screen3.5
- Performance0.0
- Camera1.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThis is excellent (as long as you get the 8GB version)
Well, I think it's a good, excellent phone. I think the frames and edges are nice, although the bottom edge, which is thicker, doesn't lock normally and opens quickly without any problems.
Pros- Acceptable processor
- The RAM is fine (as long as it is the 8GB one)
- It has the 120 HZ
- It sounds powerful
- The battery lasts a long time (depending on use)
- For basic and somewhat complex tasks it is acceptable.
Cons- The quality of the screen (it's not very noticeable but if you get closer it's hardly noticeable)
- I feel like the camera in video mode can be improved
- Wide edge at the bottom (not so wide)
View original review- 8
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.6
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoEntry level Honor with some unresolved issues.
I will say that this entry level Honor did not excite me. Reception and audio in calls OK. A slowness when taking photos like a phone from 12 years ago. Not even resolved with the GCam. Lag and bugs on gestures (confuses swipe to home with multitasking) not resolved after recent updates. I have other Honor and there is not a shadow of these problems. 4 GB for a device around 200 euros is really little. Not bad browsing speed on browser. Average audio, good battery life. I have not tested it under water or thrown on the ground I trust these merits praised in the promo videos of bloggers.
Pros- 256GB
- drums
- 6.8'' display
- resistant and somewhat waterproof
- the design is not bad
Cons- Only 4GB
- small package, only cable and film
- medium slow overall
- gestures sometimes bugged
- slippery on the back
View original review- 7.4
- Screen7.2
- Performance5.5
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 7 days ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- RAM 1 year ago
- Usable surface, Features 1 year ago
- Capacity (mAh), Fast charge, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
- Aliases, Thickness, Weight, Inches, Resolution, Resolution, Density, Market, Resolution 1 year ago
Score
- 6.6 Design & Materials
- 6.4 Performance & Hardware
- 6.3 Camera
- 7.1 Connectivity
- 7.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
