User score

Overall satisfaction
  • 2
  • 3
  • 5
  • 4
  • 2
16 reviews
  • Screen5.8
  • Performance5.3
  • Camera4.5
  • Connectivity6.8
  • Battery6.1
Want to comment on the Huawei Y625?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?

16 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?

16 reviews

Is it comfortable?

16 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?

16 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?

16 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?

16 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?

16 reviews


Quality of daytime photos

16 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos

16 reviews

Quality of selfies

16 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?

16 reviews


Does it have good coverage for calls?

16 reviews

Quality of the GPS

16 reviews

And the WiFi?

16 reviews


How long does the battery last?
  • 7%
    Less than half day
  • 40%
    Less than a day
  • 33%
    One day
  • 20%
    More than one day
  • 0%
    Two days or more

16 reviews


Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 7%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 67%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 27%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

16 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 69%
  • 15%
    Once a year
  • 8%
    Every six months
  • 8%
    Every two months or less

16 reviews

View more

User reviews

  • Auto
    Nostalgia, I will just say that I see this phone and I remember the all-powerful J2 prime

    Why review a cell phone that has the same years in power as Maduro? well, I'll just say that the Stanford 2 runs at a stable 20 FPS with boosters

    • 1
    • Screen6.2
    • Performance1.6
    • Camera1.7
    • Connectivity5.6
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    Durable but old

    I had a very old LG cell phone from 2010 and my sister had this phone, I used it for 3 and a half years and then the phone gave my sister problems and she bought a J4 and the phone gave it to me, the first thing What I noticed is that the screen does not resist anything even with the protector also the battery did not last long and because of the pre-installed applications and the memory of the system it had only 1gb of space and 500mb of ram also almost no modern game was compatible with the device so I was satisfied with the java games of gameloft, time passed and it had already been quite slow, I had had the phone for 1 year and a half and the speaker spoiled it myself: v and gave the first fatal error, but I was able to solve it, then he gave the second and he had already died at the time, but since he had a tablet I did not want to go to fix it and I stay in the trunk ... I give it from 1 to 10 a 6.

    • good coverage calls
    • Durable
    • good emergency phone
    • device space and ram
    • he is old
    • not resistant
    • over time it has many flaws
    • 5.3
    • Screen5.2
    • Performance4.6
    • Camera5.7
    • Connectivity8.5
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto

    • 7.1
    • Screen7.5
    • Performance7.0
    • Camera7.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    In his years good mobile

    This mobile I was using x 2 years and I thought it was good for 2016 was fine, but with the development of new technologies as its 1 gb of ram and became slow ...

    • 8.1
    • Screen7.3
    • Performance7.7
    • Camera9.7
    • Connectivity4.7
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Very old

    • 3.1
    • Screen4.3
    • Performance2.0
    • Camera1.8
    • Connectivity5.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto

    It's bad, but because of how bad it is, it's not good. It is the cell who has to function and it is the functioning of the cell phone, the cell phone system. It is a cell whose airplane mode does not work, it does not fly. Now yes, it is very improvable but for the price it is.

    • Not bad as an emergency phone
    • Improvement of the lag
    • The camera
    • The screen
    • I design
    • airplane mode
    • 1.5
    • Screen3.5
    • Performance6.7
    • Camera1.5
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    From day to day he died, he used to crash sometimes, and his little memory kept me from going into other apps

    Its design was not bad at all, I will not complain about this because it was not ugly and was not uncomfortable, but his camera was not the best, only had 2mp on the front camera ... so it is difficult to defend and his battery was Reasonable, I admit that I kept clinging to it all the time and finished in less than a day, but when I gave it normal use it lasted 1 day and a few hours.

    • Design
    • Battery
    • Camera
    • Memory
    • 5.9
    • Screen7.8
    • Performance5.7
    • Camera5.3
    • Connectivity7.3
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    Sufficient at the time

    Smartphone ok for a low end.

    • Fluid
    • Beautiful
    • Little storage
    • 6.7
    • Screen3.8
    • Performance5.3
    • Camera2.3
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    For the price you can find much better mobiles. The processor died without warning from day to day.

    • 5
    • Screen6.3
    • Performance6.3
    • Camera4.8
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Simple and nothing else

    • For a low range you can not ask for much but those 4GB of memory hurt
    • 2.7
    • Screen4.8
    • Performance2.3
    • Camera2.8
    • Connectivity6.3
    • Battery9.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
April 1, 2024
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 1 month ago
Ki Cost-effective
Not available
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.