you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
iiiF150 Air2 Ultra reviews by real users iiiF150 Air2 Ultra
- 6.8"AMOLEDFHD+21:9
- 230 g79.8 mm170.3 mm8.6 mm
- Dimensity 7050 Octa-Core 16 GB RAM 512 GB
- 550.000 v10
- 5000 mAh 65 W
- 1 108 Mpx ƒ/1.88 2 64 Mpx Unknow SELF 32 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- Screen8.6
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.7
- Battery8.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
- After a couple of days the first impression is good...lets use it for a while...
OK, after a full week the IIIF150 Air 2 seems to be a good phone! Works smoothly, WiFi excellent, BT works fine, 5G also works fine and the screen is fantastic, even on full sunlight! Face & Fingerprint are good and now...wait some days for the camera to check...
The Auto-brightness works not fine (on android13) hope is an OS problem and not the brightness sensor.Pros- Biometrics works really good
- Screen quality excellent
Cons- The rear cameras dont allow to charge wireless in the car
- 8.6
- Screen9.2
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoMore marketing than reality
It is a phone with a good processor, a lot of memory, and enough battery, with good sound and microphone quality in the call, but the 5G that it promises is not fulfilled by all operators (for example Yoigo, Orange group), a very poor fingerprint sensor, it does not lock the screen when you talk to it in your ear and sometimes it puts you in airplane mode in the middle of a conversation, a very bad brightness sensor, without options to customize, for example, the warning bubbles. And without having had any update except Android in the almost three months that I have had it. And the 108MP camera gives very poor quality.
Pros- Processor
- Memory
- Agile with applications
- Hard for daily work
Cons- 108MP Camera
- Fingerprint sensor
- 5G not real
- Does not lock screen when talking
- Brightness sensor
- Some menus not translated
View original review- 7.1
- Screen6.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.6
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- Version 11 months ago
- Name, Features 1 year ago
- New opinion 1 year ago
- RAM, Storage 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- AnTuTu Version 2 years ago
- Bluetooth, Photos, Photos 2 years ago
- Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Fast charge, Aspect Ratio, Market, Operating System, Processor, Resolution, Flash, Screen Type, Camera, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Sensor Type, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Fingerprint, SIM card, SIM card, SIM card, Battery Composition 2 years ago
- Release date, Range, Similar name, Predecessor 2 years ago
Score
- 6.9 Design & Materials
- 7.6 Performance & Hardware
- 6.9 Camera
- 7.9 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
