Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 4.7"LowRes71% useful16:9
- 121 g 66.0 mm 129.6 mm 10.0 mm
- SnapD. 400 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM 8 GB
- v? 17.466
- 2440 mAh
- 1 8 Mpx · Unknow SELF 1.3 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Bands
- 3G4 bands
- 2G4 bands
- Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.0.2 Lollipop
User score
- 1
- 7
- 2
- 0
- 0
- Screen6.9
- Performance5.5
- Camera5.4
- Connectivity7.2
- Battery6.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
10 opinions
10 opinions
10 opinions
10 opinions
Performance & Hardware
10 opinions
10 opinions
10 opinions
Camera
10 opinions
10 opinions
10 opinions
10 opinions
Connectivity
10 opinions
10 opinions
10 opinions
Battery
- 10%Less than half day
- 30%Less than a day
- 20%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
10 opinions
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 60%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 40%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
10 opinions
- 29%Never
- 57%Once a year
- 0%Every six months
- 14%Every two months or less
10 opinions
User reviews
User Reviews
- 4.2
- Screen4.3
- Performance3.0
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity3.6
- Battery0.0
View answers- AutoNot bad
I took it a long time ago with Vodafone's stay since it was really cheap, I remember about 5 euros a month, you could not ask for much for its price, but it was not bad, its screen looked good outdoors (without being HD) . It was moderately fluid even though it was limited hardware (4 cores at 1.2ghz) and the camera was not bad, I got good pictures with it, so it was a good acquisition as a secondary smartphone. only as a hit (which was not so much considering that I used it for WhatsApp, mail, calls and photos for work, I mean 4 or 5 apps) was that I had 8 gigabytes of internal memory, of those only 5 free for the user. I found it beautiful and very comfortable, its 4.7 "screen looked better than I expected even without having a high resolution, we must bear in mind that it was a very economical model for the date, it did not displease me at all in its time, He played with his battery and it lasted almost two days, it was pretty well optimized for a hard
Positives- Very cheap
- The screen, although limited, was not bad
- Design and back button
- the rear camera better than expected
- Good battery life
Negatives- little internal storage
- frontal camera
- the screen although it looked good was not HD
View original opinion- 6.6
- Screen7.5
- Performance5.7
- Camera5.3
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoA mobile with good features, but little RAM
It has worked very well in the first year, I am very glad this mobile. But he fails little internal memory 8 GB that barely reach 4 (removing the operating system) but can be solved with a SD Blast. It also fails little has only 1 GB RAM (but when it came out and the price was very good). Eventually all mobile spoils, but I'm very happy with the use of this mobile has lasted me two years.
Positives- Design
- screen
Negatives- RAM
- Capacity
View original opinion- 7.4
- Screen8.0
- Performance5.3
- Camera6.8
- Connectivity6.7
- Battery2.5
View answers - AutoA large mobile, for everyday use
It is a great mobile, works very fluid and has just given me problems, elegant a perfect size and excellent quality for its price. The only downside I have is for gamers who stays short but highly recommended for others.
Positives- screen
Negatives- Games
View original opinion- 8.4
- Screen9.3
- Performance6.7
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.5
View answers - Autoa cell phone 4.7 inch upgraded to android 5
has good screen, decent sound but the hard little battery .. have to load all night and space limited internal memory, installing the basic application is filled, hobby manufacturers to partition memory.
Positives- price today
Negatives- battery, internal memory space
View original opinion- 6.2
- Screen6.0
- Performance5.3
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
Score
- 2.2 Design & Materials
- 2.4 Performance & Hardware
- 2.5 Camera
- 3.3 Connectivity
- 3.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.